A Comparative Study Between Oncoplastic Breast Surgery and Standard Conservative Surgery:Margin Status and Patient Satisfaction
- Conditions
- Breastcancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Oncoplastic breast surgeryProcedure: Standard conservative breast surgery
- Registration Number
- NCT03012152
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
This non randomized study is a comparative study between standard conservative breast surgery and oncoplastic surgery as regard margin status and patient satisfaction.
- Detailed Description
This planned study was conducted on 70 female patients presented to our tertiary referral breast unit at Ain Shams University hospitals with breast cancer amid the period from September 2012 to May 2013 .
Every one of them signed an informed consent to partake in this study that was approved in a meeting held by the ethical committee on august 2012 at Ain Shams University. All patients sharing in the study received closed envelope before surgery in a randomized way in which the surgical technique is written either standard conservative surgery or oncoplastic surgery(Double Blind).
Our patients were partitioned into 2 equal groups: group A (35patients) who underwent standard conservative surgery, group B (35patients) who underwent oncoplastic surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 70
- Female Patients with stage 1,2 breast cancer.
- Patients >60 years.
- Patients with previous breast surgery.
- patients candidate for mastectomy or palliative excision. Patients with collagen disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Oncoplastic group Oncoplastic breast surgery Group B(35 patients) have curative oncoplastic surgery in which plastic techniques integrated with oncological procedures Standard conservative group Standard conservative breast surgery Group A (35 patients) have standard curative conservative breast surgery without integration of plastic techniques . .
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Margins in all specimens measured in millimeters 2. 2 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method