A clinical trial to compare whether Tuoren videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope is better for laryngoscopy and intubation in children undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/04/024556
- Lead Sponsor
- Maulana Azad Medical College
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1) Children posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia
2)American Society Of Anesthesiologists grade I,II children
Exclusion Criteria
1)Predicted difficult airway as per history and examination
2)Patient with reactive airway disease
3)Patient at risk of aspiration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to successful tracheal intubation in terms of <br/ ><br>a)time taken for obtaining best laryngeal view <br/ ><br>b)time taken for successful tube passageTimepoint: Laryngoscopy using either macintosh laryngoscope or videolaryngoscope will be attempted after 3 minutes of administration of muscle <br/ ><br>relaxant
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1)Number of attempts for successful tracheal intubation <br/ ><br>2)Laryngeal view using POGO score <br/ ><br>3)Number of maneuvers required to achieve successful tracheal intubationTimepoint: Laryngoscopy using either macintosh laryngoscope or videolaryngoscope will be attempted after 3 minutes of administration of muscle <br/ ><br>relaxant