Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03157505
NCT03157505CompletedPhase 3

Efficacy and Safety of Birch Pollen Immunotherapy in Local Allergic Rhinitis

Medical University of Silesia0 sites78 target enrollmentStarted: January 5, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
78
Primary Endpoint
area under the curve (AUC)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is relatively new disease. The question of effect of allergen specific immunotherapy on LAR is open. The randomized, double blind placebo controlled trial of birch subcutaneous AIT on LAR were performed in twenty eight patients. The therapy was performed during 24 months in proportion 15 patients with AIT and 13 placebo. The primary endpoint was decreased of symptoms medication score (SMS). Additionally monitoring serum specific IgE, specific IgG4 and nasal specific IgE (nsIgE) to Bet v1 and parameters of safety and quality of life were provided.

Detailed Description

Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is still an under diagnosed and under treated disease. It is characterised by local production of IgE during natural exposure to aeroallergens. These patients have negative skin prick tests and serum-specific IgEs but have positive nasal provocation tests for aeroallergens. More than 50% of patients with chronic non-allergic rhinitis may have a problem with lack of LAR diagnosis. Misdiagnosis can lead to mistakes in the treatment as well as inefficiencies.

Besides on only local IgE-mediated reaction, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) could be a potential way of treatment such patients. However, there are only sufficient data that the AIT is effective in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma to pollens and house dust mites and some animal.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of AIT for birch pollen allergens in patients with local allergic rhinitis and a confirmed birch pollen allergy.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • well document symptoms of rhinitis during birch pollen season
  • positive nasal provocation test to birch
  • negative results of skin prick tests to inhalant allergen including: D. pteronyssius, D. farinae, grass pollen, birch, hazel, alder Alternaria, and cat.
  • negative results of serum total and allergen specific IgE against mentioned allergens.

Exclusion Criteria

  • diagnosis of bronchial asthma, non-allergic rhinitis (especially senile or vasomotor rhinitis) and severe non-stable diseases. All subjects were required to abstain from anti-allergy drugs and glucocorticoid nasal drops for at least 6 weeks prior to the start of the study.

Arms & Interventions

Purethal Birch immunotherapy

Active Comparator

Purethat Birch intervention and symptomatic treatment for 24 months

Intervention: Purethal Birch immunotherapy (Drug)

placebo and symptomatic treatment

Placebo Comparator

placebo intervention and symtomatic treatment during 24 months

Intervention: Placebo and symptomatic treatment (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

area under the curve (AUC)

Time Frame: 24 months

area under the curve (AUC) for the combined symptom and medication scores (SMS)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Andrzej Bozek

MD PhD

Medical University of Silesia

Similar Trials