Study of the Contribution of Osteopathic Treatment to Classic Medical Management in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Sham osteopathic treatmentOther: Osteopathic treatmentOther: Current practice Medication treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT03836248
- Lead Sponsor
- Clinique Pasteur
- Brief Summary
The management of chronic low back pain is now part of a multi-disciplinary set of proposals with the aim of adapting for each patient orientations of both medicated and non-medicated care.
Very classically, analgesic treatment of stage I or II is of use, reinforced by the occasional use of NSAIDs in the absence of contraindication. In this medical attempt of the control of the pain associates a physical care (supervised exercises, physiotherapy care), cognitive and behavioral therapy, multidisciplinary care.
Osteopathic treatment is a specific manual diagnostic and therapeutic procedure.
This study aims to evaluate the relevance of providing osteopathic treatment in combination with classical medical treatment in the management of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
- Detailed Description
The primary objective is to show that the addition of osteopathic treatment to classical medical treatment decreases pain for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.
This goal will be evaluated at 3 months by comparing
* the 3-month change in the level of pain observed in arm 3 (classical medical treatment + osteopathic treatment) versus that observed in arm 1 (classical medical treatment), and
* the 3-month change in the level of pain observed in arm 3 (classical medical treatment + osteopathic treatment) versus that observed in arm 2 (classical medical treatment+ sham osteopathic treatment ).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 199
- Patient with chronic non-specific low back pain: degenerative lumbalgia and low back pain unrelated to anatomical lesions that have been evolving for more than 3 months.
- Patient affiliated with a social security scheme or equivalent
- Patient having signed the study informed consent form.
- Patient with specific low back pain: patient with one of the following pathologies: degenerative neurological pathology; infectious pathology; fracture vertebral lesion less than 1 year; vertebral osteosynthesis material or canal narrowing.
- Patient following a treatment of the Morphinic or Neuroleptic type.
- Pregnant, breastfeeding or parturient woman
- Patient participating in another clinical study
- Protected patient: Major under some form of guardianship ; Hospitalized without consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2- Sham osteopathic treatment Current practice Medication treatment Medication treatment according to current practice + sham osteopathic treatment. 3- Osteopathic treatment Current practice Medication treatment Medication treatment according to current practice + osteopathic treatment. 2- Sham osteopathic treatment Sham osteopathic treatment Medication treatment according to current practice + sham osteopathic treatment. 1-Current practice Medication treatment Current practice Medication treatment Medication treatment according to current practice. 3- Osteopathic treatment Osteopathic treatment Medication treatment according to current practice + osteopathic treatment.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain VAS Visual Analog Scale Change from baseline to 3 months The primary outcome is the change in the VAS score on a 0-100 mm scale between Day 0 (before the placement of any osteopathic manipulations for Arm 3 ( or sham osteopathic treatment for Arm 2) and J90 ( after the last osteopathic treatment session for Arm 3 (sham osteopathic treatment for Arm 2)).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain VAS , level improvement Baseline, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 The improvement of the pain level will be objectified by the measurement of the variation of the VAS score.
Hand-Ground Distance and Schöber test Baseline, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 The efficacy of functional and quality of life therapies will be assessed through functional clinical examinations (Hand-Ground Distance and Schöber test )
Adverse event Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 Adverse events will be collected and analyzed for each arm.
Drug consumption Baseline, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 Drug consumption will be collected by patients using a patient diary and converted to DDD ( Defined Daily Dose).
Relief Numerical scale Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 The intensity of relief will be objectified by measuring the variation of the "relief" score on a numerical scale. Numeric Scale Cotation between 0% (No Relief) to 100%(Full Relief)
Elements of the osteopathic diagnosis Day 1, Day 7, Day 15, Month 1 Month 2 The elements of the osteopathic diagnosis will be collected by the treating osteopaths at the beginning and at the end of each treatment. Exploratory outcome, osteopathic diagnosis will be assessed by an internal osteopath questionnaire specifying anatomical localization of identified dysfunctions.
Oswestry score Baseline, Day 15, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6 The efficacy of functional and quality of life therapies will be assessed through the self questionnaire: the Oswestry questionnaire.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Clinique Pasteur
🇫🇷Toulouse, France