G-CSF+DAC+BUCY vs. G-CSF+DAC+BF Conditioning Regimen for Patients With RAEB-1, RAEB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 入组人数
- 242
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
研究概览
简要总结
Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure MDS and AML secondary to MDS. At present, the best conditioning regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. In this prospective study, the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT are evaluated.
详细描述
Allo-HSCT is the most effective way to cure MDS and AML secondary to MDS. At present, the best conditioning regimen for MDS and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT remains in discussion. Our previous study has showed that G-CSF+DAC+BUCY conditioning regimen could reduce the relapse and improve the survival compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the two conditioning regimens both have high non-relapse mortality (NRM). Several retrospective and prospective studies including ours have demonstrated that BF conditioning regimen has a lower NRM compared with BUCY conditioning regimen, while the relapse and survival are similar in patients undergoing BF and BUCY conditioning regimens. Based on the above, we design the prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G-CSF+DAC+BUCY and G-CSF+DAC+BF conditioning regimens in RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 14 Years 至 65 Years（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo-HSCT
- •14-65 years
排除标准
- •Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
- •Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)
研究组 & 干预措施
G-CSF+DAC+BF
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3.
干预措施: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BF
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3.
干预措施: Decitabine (DAC) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BF
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3.
干预措施: Busulfan (BU) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BF
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BF conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -6 to -3, Fludarabine (FLU) 30mg/m2/ day on days -7 to -3.
干预措施: Fludarabine (FLU) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
干预措施: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor(G-CSF) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
干预措施: Decitabine (DAC) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
干预措施: Busulfan (BU) (Drug)
G-CSF+DAC+BUCY
For patients with RAEB-1, REAB-2 and AML Secondary to MDS undergoing allo- HSCT, Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF)+Decitabine+BUCY conditioning regimen was G-CSF 5ug/kg/day on days -17 to -10 (when white blood cell is more than 20G/L, stop using G-CSF), Decitabine 20mg/m2/day on days -14 to -10, Busulfan (BU) 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4, Cyclophosphamide (CY) 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.
干预措施: Cyclophosphamide (CY) (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
时间窗: 1 year
次要结局
- Overall survival (OS)(1 year)
- Disease-free survival (DFS)(1 year)
- Relapse rate(1 year)
研究者
Qifa Liu
Professor
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University