Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05960422
NCT05960422CompletedNot Applicable

Effects of Adding Adductor Canal Block to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block in Hallux Valgus Correction Operations

Istanbul Medeniyet University1 site in 1 country52 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
52
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Postoperative Pain

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to determine the effect of adding adductor canal block to popliteal sciatic nerve block on patient-surgeon satisfaction, intraoperative sedation need, tourniquet pain, return time of motor block, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing hallux valgus correction surgery. The main question it aims to answer are:

  • Does peroperative pain decrease?
  • Do patient-surgeon satisfaction increase? The patients were divided into two groups, the Popliteal Sciatic Block (PSB) group, and the Popliteal Sciatic Block + Adductor Canal Block (PSB + ACB) group.

Detailed Description

Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups as popliteal sciatic nerve block (Group PSB), popliteal sciatic nerve + adductor canal block (Group PSB + ACB). In this study, 52 patients scheduled for hallux valgus correction operations, in the American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III groups, between the ages of 18-80, were enrolled. Study was planned as a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. All patients were perfomed PSB with 10 ml 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml 2% prilocaine in the prone position, using ultrasonography and nerve stimulator. 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 10 ml of 2% prilocaine were administered to the patients in the ACB + PSB group in the supine position, in addition to PSB. Patients with coagulopathy, infection at the region site of regional blockade, allergy of local anesthetic drugs, peripheral neuropathy and neurogenic disorders affecting the lower extremities, peripheral artery disease, mental retardation and those who did not give consent to study were excluded. All patients were sedated with 1-2 mg midazolam and 50 µg fentanyl. After the blocks were performed , sensory -motor block onset time, surgery-tourniquet time, tourniquet pain, motor block time, pain onset time, first analgesic administration time (NPRS≥4) and analgesic administered were recorded. Anesthesiologists evaluating these data were blinded to group distribution .

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients aged between 18 and 80
  • •American Society of Anesthesiologists ASA I-III

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with coagulopathy
  • •Patient with wounds or infections in the region
  • •Patient with allergies to local anesthetic drugs
  • •Patient with significantly impaired peripheral neuropathy and neurogenic disorders affecting the lower extremity
  • •Patient with peripheral arterial disease
  • •Patient with mental retardation

Arms & Interventions

Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block

Active Comparator

Patients are in the group undergoing popliteal sciatic block

Intervention: Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block (Procedure)

Adductor Canal Block

Active Comparator

Patients are in the group undergoing popliteal sciatic block + adductor canal block

Intervention: Adductor canal block (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Postoperative Pain

Time Frame: Postoperative 24 hours

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Between 1-10. The low values mean low pain and a better outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Istanbul Medeniyet University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ezgi POLAT

Principal Investigator

Istanbul Medeniyet University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials