Benefit of Permanent Stimulation of the Left Branch of the His Bundle Versus Right Ventricular Stimulation After Atrioventricular Node Ablation for Rapid Atrial Fibrillation
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation Rapid
- Interventions
- Procedure: left bundle branch of His pacingProcedure: right ventricular pacing
- Registration Number
- NCT06061978
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional benefit of left bundle branch of His pacing compared to right ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a pacemaker prior to a atrioventricular node ablation procedure for rapid atrial fibrillation
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
1/ Pacemaker implanted patient with LBTP lead and back-up right ventricular lead who subsequently underwent successful atrioventricular node ablation for rapid AF 2) NAV ablation procedure performed less than 15 days ago 3) Age ≥ 18 years 4) Woman of childbearing age with effective contraception (estrogen-progestin or intrauterine device or tubal ligation) for at least 1 month and for the duration of the study, and a negative urine pregnancy test by B-HCG at inclusion Or, Postmenopausal woman: confirmatory diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months prior to the inclusion visit).
- Membership of a social security scheme 6) Patient follow-up feasible 7) Patient has read and understood the information leaflet and signed the informed consent form
- Impairment of autonomy such that a maximal cardiorespiratory effort test (VO2 Max test) cannot be performed under good conditions (ADL scale < 5).
- LVEF < 40% at inclusion
- Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, or person under court protection, sub-guardianship or curatorship.
- Patient participating in another interventional trial
- Any history of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol, or from giving informed consent.
- Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women, or those without proven contraception
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description right ventricular pacing (RVP) then left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP) right ventricular pacing - left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP) then right ventricular pacing (RVP) right ventricular pacing - left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP) then right ventricular pacing (RVP) left bundle branch of His pacing - right ventricular pacing (RVP) then left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP) left bundle branch of His pacing -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Maximum Oxygen Consumption (VO2 max) in mL/min/kg. 18 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Determination of NT pro BNP or BNP 18 months walking test distance covered 18 months echography criteria: LVEF (%), indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (mL/m2), indexed cardiac output (L/min/m2), inter-ventricular asynchrony criteria (aortic pre-ejection time - pulmonary pre-ejection time) 18 months Physical component of quality-of-life scale (SF-36) 18 months Medico-economic criteria: incremental cost-utility ratio of LBTP versus RVP 18 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU de CAEN
🇫🇷Caen, France