跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06795321
NCT06795321已完成不适用

Patients' Anesthesia Preferences for Cesarean Delivery: Exploring the Role of Personality Beliefs in Spinal vs. General Anesthesia

Ondokuz Mayıs University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2024年1月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
150
试验地点
1
主要终点
Personality belief scores of patients who preferred general or spinal anesthesia

研究概览

简要总结

Cesarean deliveries (CD) under general anesthesia are still common despite higher risks. Clinical guidelines recommend neuraxial anesthesia, but many patients refuse it due to fear and anxiety. This study aims to compare the personality traits of mothers who chose general versus spinal anesthesia for CD.

详细描述

Cesarean deliveries (CD) under general anesthesia continue to be common in many countries, though the practice varies in frequency. In the United States, about 5.8% of CDs are performed under general anesthesia. In Europe, the rate is higher in some countries, with 10% in Germany, 30% in Spain, and 34% in the Czech Republic. The exact rate in the study's country is not known but is assumed to be high. Clinical guidelines suggest that neuraxial anesthesia (spinal or epidural) should be the preferred choice for CD unless there are specific contraindications. This recommendation stems from the increased risks of general anesthesia, which include airway complications, aspiration risks, significant blood loss, and the potential for intraoperative awareness.

General anesthesia may still be a suitable option when spinal anesthesia is contraindicated or in cases with severe complications such as fetal bradycardia, uterine rupture, heavy bleeding, or placental abruption. Despite these risks, many patients still choose or are administered general anesthesia, often rejecting neuraxial anesthesia. The use of general anesthesia for CD carries higher risks of anesthesia-related complications, surgical site infections, and venous thromboembolism. This highlights the need to minimize the unnecessary use of general anesthesia by better understanding the factors that influence patients' anesthesia preferences.

One of the most common reasons patients refuse regional anesthesia (spinal or epidural) is the fear of spinal injury, concerns about the pain from the needle insertion, or anxiety about witnessing the surgical procedure. On the other hand, those who opt for regional anesthesia often cite the fear of not waking up from general anesthesia and the desire to remain conscious during childbirth. Research also suggests that anxiety levels are linked to the choice of anesthesia, though previous studies have yielded conflicting results.

Study Hypothesis and Aim: The study hypothesizes that patients' anesthesia preferences during CD might be influenced by their personality traits. While no prior studies have examined the relationship between personality traits and anesthesia preferences specifically in CD patients, some studies have explored the impact of personality on maternal delivery preferences (whether a woman chooses CD or vaginal delivery). The primary aim of this study is to compare the personality belief scores of expecting mothers who undergo CD with either general or spinal anesthesia, according to their preferred anesthesia type.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 45 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Patients aged between 18 and 45 years,
  • •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of II-III,
  • •Who were planned to undergo elective cesarean delivery (CD)

排除标准

  • •Patients who did not agree to participate in the study
  • •Patients requiring emergency cesarean delivery (CD)
  • •Patients with an absolute contraindication to general or regional anesthesia
  • •Patients lacking the educational or mental capacity to complete the evaluation scales
  • •Patients who were not informed about the study during the preoperative visit or did not provide written consent to participate

结局指标

主要结局

Personality belief scores of patients who preferred general or spinal anesthesia

时间窗: The time when the patients were in the preoperative waiting room before surgery.

The personality belief was assessed using The Personality Belief Questionnaire Short Form (PBQ-SF). The Personality Belief Questionnaire Short Form (PBQ-SF) is a 65-item self-reported questionnaire designed to assess an individual's personality. The PBQ-SF was created by selecting the seven highest-scoring items for each personality trait from the original PBQ.12 The form contained statements related to ten different personality disorders/features (avoidant, dependent, passive-aggressive, obsessive-compulsive, antisocial, narcissistic, histrionic, schizoid, paranoid, and borderline). The patients were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with these statements on a 0-4 scale (0 = not at all, 1 = slightly agree, 2 = moderately agree, 3 = very much agree, and 4 = totally agree). Personality traits were examined based on the scores generated by the responses. The PBQ-SF has been translated into Turkish and its validity.

次要结局

  • Patient satisfaction(postoperative day 1)
  • Sociodemographic datas(preoperative 30 minutes ago)
  • Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI I-II)(The time when the patients were in the preoperative waiting room before surgery.)

研究者

发起方
Ondokuz Mayıs University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Esra Turunc

Director

Ondokuz Mayıs University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验