To compare and evaluate the amount of gingival displacement by conventional retraction agent, cordless retraction paste and oxymetazoline soaked retraction cords
Phase 1
Completed
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/04/032763
- Lead Sponsor
- DR SHRINIDHI R POONJA
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 66
Inclusion Criteria
Patient aged >18yrs of age.
ï?· Healthy gingiva and periodontium of the abutment teeth.
ï?· Abutment teeth should be of normal size and contour, devoid of any development anomaly
or regressive age changes
ï?· Preparation needed for full coverage restoration.
ï?· Patients with thick gingival biotype will be selected.
Exclusion Criteria
Periodontitis
ï?· Gingival recession
ï?· Tipped, tilted or rotated abutment
ï?· Hypertension
ï?· Patient with known allergy to oxymetazoline and aluminium chloride.
ï?· Pregnant and lactating women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method AMOUNT OF GINGIVAL DISPLACEMENT CAUSED BY 25% ALUMINIUM CHLORIDE GEL , 0.05% OXYMETAZOLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND CORDLESS RETRACTION PASTE.Timepoint: 1WEEK
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TO COMPARE THE AMOUNT OF GINGIVAL RETRACTION BY 25% ALUMINIUM CHLORIDE GEL , 0.05%OXYMETAZOLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND CORDLESS RETRACTION PASTETimepoint: 1WEEK