Diaphragmatic Breathing During Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Aviophobia
- Conditions
- Fear of Flying
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Diaphragmatic breathingBehavioral: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
- Registration Number
- NCT02990208
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Regensburg
- Brief Summary
The study investigated the effect of diaphragmatic breathing as an additional coping strategy during Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy in patients with aviophobia. The authors assumed that diaphragmatic breathing (DB) would lead to less fear and physiological arousal during the VRET and to an enhanced treatment outcome
- Detailed Description
Patients with aviophobia received treatment in Virtual Reality with or without DB. The authors assumed that adding DB to VRET would enhance treatment effects by reducing fear during exposure, thus improving the processing of the feared situation. The authors hypothesized that, as a result, self-efficacy would be increased in comparison to VRET alone.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- age 20 to 65
- flying experience
- subjective rating of fear of flying > 60 from 100
- pregnancy
- heart disease
- current involvement in psychotherapy and/or pharmacotherapy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description VR exposure + diaphragmatic breathing Diaphragmatic breathing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy + Diaphragmatic breathing VR exposure + diaphragmatic breathing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy + Diaphragmatic breathing VR exposure Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in FFS (Fear of Flying Scale) scores immediately before the exposure session, immediately after the exposure session, immediately before the test session (which took place one week after the exposure session), immediately after the test session, in a follow up (one year later) The Fear of Flying Scale (FFS; German version (Mühlberger \& Pauli, 2011)) covers 21 flight situations (e.g., planning the trip, boarding a plane, turbulence during the flight) rated on a 5-point Likert scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in self-efficacy scores immediately before the exposure session, immediately after the exposure session, immediately before the test session (which took place one week after the exposure session), immediately after the test session, in a follow up (one year later) Change in electrodermal activity (skin conductance level) during the four 2-min phases of each of the three VR flights of the exposure session and of each of the two VR flights of the test session. Change in heart rate during the four 2-min phases of each of the three VR flights of the exposure session and of each of the two VR flights of the test session. Change in fear ratings both during the VR flights (consisting of four 2-min phases each) of the exposure and the test session. Ratings were asked one minute after the beginning of each phase of each flight. Patients were asked to rate their current fear on a scale from 0 (no fear) to 100 (extreme fear)