An Experimental Examination of a Racecar-simulation Psychoeducational Intervention and the Effects on Health and Performance-based Outcomes of Veterans Diagnosed With PTSD
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 1
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The Quality of Life Scale
研究概览
简要总结
Nova Southeastern University and the Veterans trust through this line of research will strengthen community engagement and awareness for the need to recognize and provide treatment models for veterans diagnosed with PTSD. The goal is to improve self-regulatory mechanisms within the racecar simulated-environment with the hope it translates to real-life scenarios.
The design is a single-case approach with the application of range-bound changing criterion design. It will include elements of stress-inoculation therapy, cognitive processing therapy, optimal zones of functioning, biofeedback and psychological skills training. This particular design will allow for the collection and identification of the idiosyncratic differences between each participant which will guide how the data are collected and the tailoring of the intervention.
详细描述
Initially, the participants undergo all pre-test assessments at the Neuropsychology Assessment Center prior to being deemed eligible for the experiment. Next, participants will be scheduled individually to visit the Race Lab to become acquainted with the lab and virtual environment. Basics of the research study will be explained to each participant as part of the adaptation process. This will include a brief educational lesson on the Psychological Skills Training intervention. Following the adaptation period, the participant will commence with the experimental race-car psychoeducational intervention.
Design. A single-case approach with the Range-Bound Changing Criterion design (RBCC) will used. The RBCC design is a variant of the changing criterion design used in single-subjects research to allow for the systematic shaping of behaviors in the pursuit of short- and long-term based objectives. As a result, the design adequately allows for the application of the Learning-Modification-Application Model (LMA), which is based on the premise of periodization (i.e., step-wise incremental changes as a means to improve performance through increased challenges). That is, following baseline collection, a performance range-bound criterion will be established a-priori based on the phase of the LMA model. Control is established when the participant's performance consistently matches or surpasses the criterion within the given phase of the LMA and continues to progress throughout the subsequent intervention phases as performance criteria becomes more rigorous. See Table 1 and Figure 1 for the basics of the RBCC Design.
Table 1. Range-Bound Changing Criterion Design Legend Design Notation Design Phase A Baseline B Learning C Modification D Application
Figure 1. Condensed Design Structure of the RBCC Design
Treatment Phase Design Structure
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •All veterans of the US Military
- •Clinical diagnosis of PTSD
- •Completed the Veterans Trust Self-Regulatory Mastery course with the Race-Simulator
排除标准
- •Severe/markedly elevated severity rating on the CAPS-5
- •Extreme/incapacitating severity rating on the CAPS-5
- •Emphysema
- •Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- •History of heart disease
研究组 & 干预措施
Trial
Psychological Skills Training (PST). The PST will include elements, both generalized and idiosyncratic, for each participant and is considered an adapted model of stress inoculation skills training protocol. The specifics will include each participant's unique optimal and poor ranges of performance (i.e., IZOFs), which will be calculated utilizing HRV, BPM, EMG, respiration and subjective affect. The participants will be introduced to their IZOFs and then taught general and specific approaches to self-regulation using elements of a mindfulness protocol for BFB in a clinical environment. A dual-monitor setup for the BFB application will be employed.
干预措施: Psychological Skills Training (PST) (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
The Quality of Life Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(QOLS). The QOLS is used to assess quality of life across a wide-range of clinical and non-clinical groups and is considered distinct from health status or other indicators of quality of life. Scores range from 16 to 112. Higher scores represent enhanced QOL.
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(DERS). The DERS is an assessment tool for gauging challenges in emotion regulation. It allows for the assessment of respondents' interactions with their emotions and generates scores across six distinct subscales. Scores range from 36 to 180. Higher scores represent enhanced self-regulatory skills.
Emotional Self-Efficacy
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(ESE). ESE is designed to assess an individual's belief that he or she can appropriately respond to positive and negative environmental cues, particularly when there is little motivation to do so. Scores range from 10 to 50. Higher scores represent enhanced emotional efficacy.
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(GSE). The GDE is a 23-item tool based on Bandura's social cognitive theory, measuring overall confidence in life activities with subscales for general (GSE) and social (SSE) self-efficacy. Higher scores predict success in various areas (e.g., vocational, educational, and military settings). Scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represent enhanced general efficacy.
Psychological Skills Training Self-Efficacy
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(PST-SE). Each item of the Psychological Skills Training program will be represented in the PST-SE which include: Arousal Regulation, Self-Talk, Imagery, Goal Setting and Imagery. Scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represents enhanced PST efficacy.
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(CAPS-5). The CAPS-5 is a diagnostic interview for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). CAPS is a criterion measure, and it evaluates all PTSD criteria and associated features like dissociation. The results from the CAPS provides global ratings for distress, impairment, response validity, symptom severity, and improvement since the last assessment. 0\. Absent: 1. Mild / subthreshold: 2. Moderate / threshold: 3. Severe / markedly elevated: 4. Extreme / incapacitating: Lower score represents lowered PTSD symptoms.
The Trauma Symptoms Inventory-2-A
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(TSI-2). The TSI-2 is a self-report tool with 126 items assessing post-traumatic stress and psychological outcomes from traumatic events in adults. The tool is used to assess PTSD symptoms and broader psychological effects (i.e., well-being). Scores range from 0 to 378. Lower scores represent lowered trauma symptoms.
The Quality of Life Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(QOLS). The QOLS is used to assess quality of life across a wide-range of clinical and non-clinical groups and is considered distinct from health status or other indicators of quality of life. Scores range from 16 to 112. Higher scores represent enhanced QOL.
Emotional Self-Efficacy
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(ESE). ESE is designed to assess an individual's belief that he or she can appropriately respond to positive and negative environmental cues, particularly when there is little motivation to do so. Scores range from 10 to 50. Higher scores represent enhanced emotional efficacy.
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(DERS). The DERS is an assessment tool for gauging challenges in emotion regulation. It allows for the assessment of respondents' interactions with their emotions and generates scores across six distinct subscales. Scores range from 36 to 180. Higher scores represent enhanced self-regulatory skills.
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(GSE). The GDE is a 23-item tool based on Bandura's social cognitive theory, measuring overall confidence in life activities with subscales for general (GSE) and social (SSE) self-efficacy. Higher scores predict success in various areas (e.g., vocational, educational, and military settings). Scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represent enhanced general efficacy.
Psychological Skills Training Self-Efficacy
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(PST-SE). Each item of the Psychological Skills Training program will be represented in the PST-SE which include: Arousal Regulation, Self-Talk, Imagery, Goal Setting and Imagery. Scores range from 10 to 40. Higher scores represents enhanced PST efficacy.
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(CAPS-5). The CAPS-5 is a diagnostic interview for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). CAPS is a criterion measure, and it evaluates all PTSD criteria and associated features like dissociation. The results from the CAPS provides global ratings for distress, impairment, response validity, symptom severity, and improvement since the last assessment. 0\. Absent: 1. Mild / subthreshold: 2. Moderate / threshold: 3. Severe / markedly elevated: 4. Extreme / incapacitating: Lower score represents lowered PTSD symptoms.
The Trauma Symptoms Inventory-2-A
时间窗: pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention
(TSI-2). The TSI-2 is a self-report tool with 126 items assessing post-traumatic stress and psychological outcomes from traumatic events in adults. The tool is used to assess PTSD symptoms and broader psychological effects (i.e., well-being). Scores range from 0 to 378. Lower scores represent lowered trauma symptoms.
次要结局
- The affect grid(pre-intervention, immediately after the intervention)
- The Immersive Tendency Questionnaire(immediately after the intervention)
研究者
William Edmonds
Professor
Nova Southeastern University