MedPath

The Healthy Start Project: Primary Prevention of Overweight in Preschool Children Susceptible to Future Overweight

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obesity
Overweight
Interventions
Behavioral: Lifestyle habits, including sleep and stress
Registration Number
NCT01583335
Lead Sponsor
Bispebjerg Hospital
Brief Summary

Obesity prevention should remain a priority, although there is some evidence of a possible leveling off in some age groups across European countries and in USA, Japan and Australia. Besides adult health problems such as type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, obesity in childhood is associated with psychological and social problems, low self-esteem, stigmatization and being teased and bullied by friends. Danish research suggests that the causes behind the increase in obesity occurrence are present already in early childhood, and that prevention of obesity therefore has to start early. Research has suggested that at least three sub-groups can be considered susceptible to develop obesity: Children with obesity among their 1st degree relatives; children with a high birth weight or children coming from socially disadvantaged families (low socioeconomic status). Earlier intervention programs has showed little effect in preventing excessive weight gain and knowledge on how to develop effective intervention programs that reduce overweight and obesity remains limited. It has been suggested that future prevention programs may be more successful if specifically targeting groups that are at high risk, as mention above, of excessive weight gain.

Based on these suggestions, the "Sund Start" project was initiated. The purpose of the study was to determine whether aiming prevention towards 2-6 years old Danish children who were yet normal weight, but were considered susceptible to develop overweight or obese could prevent later on risk of becoming overweight or obese. Furthermore, to investigate if it was possible to improve diet habits, increase physical activity, reduce stress and improve sleeping habits among children at high risk for later on overweight and obesity.

The "Sund Start" project will contribute with knowledge about whether targeting normal weight, predisposed children is effective in preventing overweight and obesity, and if reduced stress and improved sleep, should be considered important new obesity prevention tools. Moreover, the project will contribute with knowledge about how to change lifestyle and its effects on development of overweight and obesity in high risk Danish preschool children.

Detailed Description

In 2009, data on all births between 2004 and 2007 in 11 selected municipalities from the greater Copenhagen area was obtained from the Danish national birth register at the National Board of Health. This register contains information on all births, whether at hospital or home, on factors such as birth weight and length, height and pre-pregnant weight of the mother, parity, and Central Personal Registry number (CPR-number). Data on socioeconomic status was obtained from the administrative birth forms. This was done manually using the CPR-numbers obtained from the birth register.

After selection of the children eligible for participation, the children were allocated to three groups, (intervention group, control group, shadow group) using computer based randomization. All siblings were allocated to the same group. After the random allocation, children from the intervention group and the control group were sent a letter with an invitation to participate in the project. Children from the shadow group were also identified, and their general practitioners were contacted and asked for information on each child's height and weight.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1202
Inclusion Criteria
  • Born between 2004-2007
  • Born in 11 selected municipalities in the greater Copenhagen area
  • Classified as susceptible to overweight and obesity (At least one of the following risk factors present: A high birth weight (> 4000 grams), maternal pre-pregnancy obesity (BMI > 28 kg/m^2), or maternal low education (<= 10 years)
  • Normal weight at baseline examination
Exclusion Criteria
  • Moved to another municipality after birth,
  • Had requested protection from participation in statistical or scientific surveys based on data delivered from the Danish Central Person Registry
  • No permanent address
  • Lived in a children's home
  • Had died
  • Had emigrated
  • Registered in the Danish Central Person Registry as being disappeared or had unknown life status
  • Not speaking Danish
  • Overweight (including obesity) at baseline examination

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Improved lifestyleLifestyle habits, including sleep and stress-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Anthropometric measurements10 years

Changes between baseline and 10 years follow.up per intervention year in:

Height in cm Weight in kg BMI in kg/m\^2 BMI z-score in SD

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Meal habits: Mealtime situation1.3 years

How would you describe the meals with the child (Very conflictive, little conflictive, very cozy, little cozy, don't know. Very cozy considered best outcome).

Meal habits: Pickiness1.3 years

How would you describe your child's way of eating (Picky, open to new tastes, eats everything. Eats everything considered best outcome).

Sleep quality: Joining parents' bed1.3 years

Child joining parents' bed (yes/no. If yes, how often (\< 1/month, 1-3 times/month,1-3 times/week, 4-6 times/week, every night)

Sleep quality: Falling asleep1.3 years

Child afraid to fall asleep (Never, rarely, some times, often, very often. Never considered best outcome)

Daily physical activity: Activity compared to other children1.3 years

How active is the child compared to other children at similar age? (as active, somewhat active, very active, don't know. Very active considered best outcome)

Daily physical activity: Activity with parents1.3 years

Frequency of which one or both parents were physically active with the child (once per week, 2-4 times per week, 5-7 times per week, multiple times per day. Multiple times per day considered best outcome)

Daily physical activity: Means of transportation1.3 years

Means of transportation to and from day-care, and frequency (Walk, strolling, bike on its own, biked by parent, and bus, train or car, number of times per week (1,2,3,4 or 5. Walking or biking on its own considered best outcome).

Dietary intake1.3 years

Four day dietary record completed Wednesday-Saturday

Priority of serving fruit and vegetables1.3 years

How high do you prioritize that fruit and vegetables are served at the meals? (Scale from 1 to 4, 1 being low and 4 being high. Higher values considered better outcome)

Physical activity1.3 years

Children's Physical Activity Questionnaire (C-PAQ. 7-day recording of sports, games and leisure time activities outside daycare. The response options were indicated by doing a particular activity ("yes" or "no") and by an indication of total time used on the activity during the week (minutes per week). All minutes per week were summed to obtain an indication of overall physical activity level. Higher values considered better outcome)

Sleep duration1.3 years

7 day sleep record from completed questionnaire (average number of minutes sleep summed from 7 day record on sleep- and wake time points)

Child stress level1.3 year

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Scored 0-2 and summed to Total Difficulties score (0-40, lower score indicate better outcome), and Prosocial Behavior score (0-10, lower score indicate worst outcome)

Parental stress level1.3 years

Modified version of the Swedish Parental Stress Index (PSI). Each question was scored between 0 and 2 (0 considered best score and 2 the worst), according to its estimated indication of an overall stress level. Analysis of intercorrelations among the 10 questions and a principal component analysis suggested that 9 of the 10 questions could be added together to get a score for the overall family stress level (0-18)

Sleep quality1.3 year

Child's sleep is considered (calm all night, a little disturbed, disturbed with occasional awakenings, very disturbed with several awakenings. Calm all night considered best outcome).

Daily physical activity: Enjoys being active1.3 years

If the child enjoyed being physically active (Never, often, some times, usually, always. Always considered best outcome)

Meal habits: Eating breakfast together1.3 years

How many times per week does the family eat breakfast together (None, 1 day, 2-3 days, 4-5 days, 6-7 days. 6-7 days considered best outcome).

Sleep quality: Difficulties falling asleep1.3 years

Difficulties falling asleep (yes/no. No considered best outcome)

Sleep quality: Bedtime routines1.3 years

Routine activities before bedtime (No, \< 1/week, 1-2 times/week, 3-4 times/week, 5-6 times/week, every day. Every day considered best outcome)

Meal habits: Eating dinner together1.3 years

How many times per week does the family eat dinner together (None, 1 day, 2-3 days, 4-5 days, 6-7 days. 6-7 days considered best outcome).

Meal habits: Appetite1.3 years

How would you describe your child's appetite (Too big appetite, good appetite, normal appetite, too small appetite, don't know. Normal appetite considered best outcome).

Sleep quality: Difficulties waking up1.3 years

Difficulties waking up (yes/no. No considered best outcome)

Sleep quality: Sleep onset latency1.3 years

Sleep onset latency (numerical. Lower values considered better outcome)

Sleep quality: Dreams1.3 years

Child has frightening/upsetting dreams (Never, rarely, some times, often, very often. Never considered best outcome)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies

🇩🇰

Frederiksberg, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath