跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03427606
NCT03427606Unknown不适用

Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Continuous Suture for Mesh Fixation

Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico0 个研究点目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2016年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
80
主要终点
Operative Time

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional single 5-points suture for anterior mesh fixation.

详细描述

Introduction Pelvic-organ prolapse, in which the pelvic organs (uterus, bladder, and bowel) protrude into or past the vaginal introitus, is a condition often treated with surgery. Women have an 11 percent risk of surgery for prolapse or urinary incontinence by 80 years of age, and of this 11 percent, almost one third of the women have a second surgery. This fact points to the need for improved treatment of pelvic-floor disorders. Numerous surgical procedures have been described for the management of POP. Vaginal surgery may be associated with less postoperative pain and a more rapid return to daily living than abdominal repair. However, in a randomised study, sacrocolpopexy was twice as likely to result in optimal anatomical outcome as vaginal surgery. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy provides the potential to combine the success rates of an abdominal approach with the faster recovery associated with a minimally invasive technique. Tissue dissection and mesh placement may also be facilitated by the magnification and field of view permitted by the laparoscopic approach. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time from 150 to 250 minutes according to surgeons' experience. In addition, this procedure is often associated to subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) for the reasons of prevention (post-menopause age) or uterine diseases, which improve still more the operating time.

This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the operative time of a standard laparoscopic sacral colpopexy associated to subtotal hysterectomy for the treatment of POP could be further reduced using using a continuous locked suture vs. conventional 5-points single suture for anterior mesh fixation.

Secondary endopoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.

To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
50 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • For patients
  • Age ≤ 80 years
  • Patient's informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV
  • Physiologic, surgical or iatrogenic menopause.
  • No previous major abdominal surgical procedures
  • For diseases
  • POP-Q stage III/IV for anterior and/or apical compartment; stage <III for posterior compartment.
  • No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders.
  • No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Continuous Suture

Experimental

干预措施: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy (Procedure)

Single 5-points Suture

Active Comparator

干预措施: Continuous Locked Suture vs Traditional 5-points suture for Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Operative Time

时间窗: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Operative time for LPS subtotal hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy operative time will be calculated from the entrance in the abdominal cavity.

次要结局

  • Recurrent Prolapse(through study completion, an average of 1 year)

研究者

发起方
Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Andrea Morciano

M.D.

Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico

相似试验