When Closing Midline Incisions, do Small Stitches Reduce the Risk for Incisional Hernia, Wound Infection or Dehiscence?
- Conditions
- Wound InfectionIncisional HerniaWound Dehiscence
- Interventions
- Procedure: Mass closureProcedure: Small stitches
- Registration Number
- NCT00508053
- Lead Sponsor
- Sundsvall Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a technique using very small stitches when closing a midline incision can reduce the risk for wound complications such as incisional hernia, infection or dehiscence.
- Detailed Description
Most abdominal surgical operations are made through a midline incision and 10% of the patients may get a wound infection. Infection is a risk factor for incisional hernia, which 12 months after the operation can be seen in 10-20% of the patients. Wound dehiscence is seen in approximately 1% of the patients. Surgery because of incisional hernias are common and in Sweden approximately 2000 patients per year needs an operation creating big costs. We know that a midline incision should be closed using a continuous technique, with a suture length to wound length ratio over 4. An earlier interventional study at the Surgical Department in Sundsvall showed that using that technique reduced the risk for hernia with 50%. Subsequent experimental studies indicates that the suture length to wound length ratio should be obtained by small stitches, placed close to each other only incorporating the aponeurosis, and not by large stitches incorporating the complete abdominal wall (mass closure). The hypothesis that midline incisions should be closed with small stitches only incorporating the aponeurosis has to be tested in a clinical trial.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 737
- Male or female patient with an acute or planned operation trough a midline incision at the Surgical Department in Sundsvall, Sweden
- Age under 18
- Previous surgery through a midline incision
- Scars from previous surgery crossing the midline
- Preexisting hernia in the midline (umbilical, epigastric)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 Mass closure Mass closure 2 Small stitches Small stitches
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Frequency of wound infection Within the first 30 days after surgery Frequency of incisional hernia One year after surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Frequency of wound dehiscence Within the first 10 days after surgery Effect of different suture techniques on wound complications related to patient characteristics such as age, BMI, sex etc. and operative characteristics such as emergency surgery, type of surgery, degree of contamination, surgeon,etc.. Within 1 year.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sundsvall Hospital
πΈπͺ851 86 Sundsvall, Sweden