Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01824108
NCT01824108CompletedPhase 3

Effectiveness of Wallis Interspinous Dynamic Stability System for Lumbar Disc Herniation: a Prospective Randomised Controlled Study

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 days before intervention

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Lumbar disc herniation is usually treated by discectomy alone. Nonfusion system such as Wallis interspinous implants have also been successfully used in disc degenerative diseases. However, the superiority of a discectomy with Wallis in comparison to a discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation has yet to be determined.The aim of our study is to investigate whether lumbar discectomy combined with the Wallis device provides better radiographic and clinical short-term outcome than posterior lumbar discectomy alone.

Detailed Description

The most commonly used therapy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) are partial discectomy or discectomy with fusion if there was an additional mechanical disorder in the underlying functional spinal unit. However, the problems associated with discectomy are intervertebral disc height loss and the segmental instability, thought to be a risk for failed back surgery syndrome or recurrence lumbar disc herniation. Fusion has also been criticised for its side effects of adjacent segment degeneration(ASD), pseudarthrosis and bone-graft morbidity. To prevent such complications , a new family of dynamic implants have been established. Wallis interspinous implant (Abbott Laboratories, Bordeaux, France) , invented by J. Senegas, is one of them. It consisted of a interspinous blocker made out of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to limit extension and two dacron tapes around the spinous processes in order to secure the implant and limit flexion. The aim of using this device is to unload the facet joints, to restore foraminal height and to provide sufficient stability especially in extension but still allow motion in the treated segment. Previous clinical trials and biomechanical studies are promising, however, the superiority of a discectomy with Wallis in comparison to a discectomy alone for primary lumbar disc herniation has yet to be determined. The purpose of this prospective controlled study was to evaluate the clinical effect of lumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous device, comparing with posterior lumbar discectomy alone. Our hypothesis was that the use of the Wallis device would have better clinical and radiological outcomes than lumbar discectomy alone.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •18-70 years old;
  • •complaining low back pain or radioactive melosalgia;
  • •preoperative image examination showing disc herniation or spinal stenosis caused by herniation of responsible level;
  • •no improvement in symptoms after 6-10 weeks of non-surgical treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •previous operations;
  • •congenital spinal deformity;
  • •lumbar fracture;
  • •autoimmune diseases;
  • •serious osteoporosis;
  • •morbidly obese;

Arms & Interventions

control group: Lumbar discectomy

Active Comparator

Lumbar discectomy alone

Intervention: Lumbar discectomy (Procedure)

Treatment group: lumbar discectomy + Wallis implant

Experimental

lumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous dynamic stability system

Intervention: Lumbar discectomy combined with Wallis interspinous dynamic stability system (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 2 days before intervention

Time Frame: 2 days before intervention

baseline VAS

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 week after intervention

Time Frame: 1 week after intervention

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 12 months after intervention

Time Frame: 12 months after intervention

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 months after intervention

Time Frame: 24 months after intervention

Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 2 days before intervention

Time Frame: 2 days before intervention

baseline JOA

Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 1 week after intervention

Time Frame: 1 week after intervention

Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 12 months after intervention

Time Frame: 12 months after intervention

Japanese Orthopedics Association (JOA) at 24 months after intervention

Time Frame: 24 months after intervention

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 2 days before intervention

Time Frame: 2 days before intervention

baseline ODI

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 week after intervention

Time Frame: 1 week after intervention

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 12 months after intervention

Time Frame: 12 months after intervention

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 24 months after intervention

Time Frame: 24 months after intervention

Secondary Outcomes

  • Intervertebral disc height of the operated segments(2 days before intervention and 1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention)
  • Range of motion of the operated segments(2 days before intervention, 12 months and 24 months after intervention)
  • Complications(1 week, 12 months and 24 months after intervention)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Qiujiang Zheng

Director of Orthopaedic Surgery

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials