Effect of a Low Residue Diet in Comparison to the Dietary Recommendations From the INCan: A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess Malnutrition, Gastrointestinal Toxicity and Quality of Life of Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients (IB2-IVA)
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Terminated
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 137
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms grading scale using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4)
Study Overview
Brief Summary
In Mexico, cervical cancer (CC) ranks second in incidence and mortality among women. The National Institute of Cancer in Mexico (lNCan) receives annually about 500 patients with CC, 80% of which are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. The standard treatment for locally advanced disease consists in concomitant chemo-radiotherapy based on cisplatin (QT-RT), followed by brachytherapy, with an absolute benefit of 10%. Adverse effects include gastrointestinal toxicity, which is the most important factor limiting the dosage of pelvic radiation. Cancer treatment, in any modality, induces malnutrition, more so when combined treatments are administered. Radiation induced gastrointestinal toxicity is caused by different factors, among which are malabsorption of bile, fat and carbohydrates, decrease in brush border enzymes, diverticular disease, proctitis, and psychological factors. International guidelines for cancer patients recommend nutritional assessment in these patients before they start treatment, so nutritional risk can be detected and the patient may get started on dietary intervention to prevent malnutrition. Several authors have studied the dietary management that may help reduce the gastrointestinal effects in cancer patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. To reduce diarrhea and prevent malnutrition the recommended dietary approach is a low residue diet consisting on 20-25% kcal from fat, 5g of lactose and 20g of fiber. Currently the INCan does not follow the nutrition care process for cervical cancer patients; written recommendations are given to the patients with a list of foods allowed or not allowed, with no further nutritional assessment or intervention. From previous studies, the investigators have demonstrated that the current recommendations do not help the patients maintain their nutritional status, during their treatment most patients become malnourished (81%, p<0.01). Therefore, the aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate a diet low in residue in CC patients, considering the necessary modifications for each patient if morbidities are present, in comparison with the current dietary recommendations used in the INCan.
Detailed Description
In Mexico, cervical cancer (CC) is the second most frequent cause of death among women, with a mortality rate of 4000 women/year. Among the patients attended by the INCan, 80% are diagnosed with locally advanced CC and 30% of these present comorbidities. Hypertension may be present in 20% of patients, obesity in 18% and diabetes in 6.8%. These comorbidities affect the efficacy of treatment, increase the risk of malnutrition, of adverse events, hospitalization, increase hospital stay and worsen the quality of life, and even increase the risk of death. Furthermore, 10 to 20% of patients present kidney deterioration. The main reason for kidney disease is ureteral obstruction. The glomerular filtration rate deteriorates with age and many patients have comorbid medical illnesses that further compromise the kidneys. The standard treatment for CC is concomitant chemo-radiotherapy using cisplatin as a radiosensitizer, and brachytherapy at the end of treatment. Studies developed in the INCan described the acute toxicity symptoms in CC patients using this treatment: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, cystitis, radioepithelitis, leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia. Pelvic radiotherapy causes gastrointestinal toxicity, which is the most important limiting factor for the patients to complete their treatment. Cancer treatment, along with the tumor itself and other factors, causes malnutrition, and this confers a bad prognosis for the patient's response to treatment and survival. There is a nutritional risk in these patients at the moment of diagnosis, because of the metabolic alterations caused by the tumor, and the treatment-induced side effects. International guidelines for cancer patients recommend nutritional assessment in these patients before they start treatment, so nutritional risk can be detected and the patient may get started on dietary intervention to prevent malnutrition. Several authors have studied the dietary management that may help reduce the gastrointestinal effects in cancer patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. To reduce diarrhea and prevent malnutrition the recommended dietary approach is a low residue diet consisting on 20-25% fat, 5g of lactose and 20g of fiber. Currently the INCan does not follow the nutrition care process for cervical cancer patients; written recommendations are given to the patients with a list of foods allowed or not allowed, with no further nutritional assessment or intervention. The investigators described the nutritional status of CC patients undergoing concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. It was observed that by the end of cancer treatment, a period of 9 weeks, 81.8% of patients became malnourished; 96% of patients lost weight, 78% of which had severe weight loss.
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate a diet low in residue in CC patients, considering the necessary modifications for each patient if morbidities are present, in comparison with the current dietary recommendations used in the INCan. A thorough nutritional evaluation including anthropometric data, dietary data, gastrointestinal toxicity and quality of life evaluations, will be performed.
Particular objectives are the following:
- Identify the nutritional status of CC patients before, during and after treatment with chemo-radiotherapy, in intervention and control groups.
- Determine the association of malnutrition and gastrointestinal toxicity during and after treatment, in intervention and control groups.
- Evaluate the quality of life of patients before, during and after treatment, in both groups.
- Establish the association of nutritional status and response to treatment, in both groups.
The aim is based on the following hypothesis: Patients receiving the personalized nutritional intervention with the low residue diet will maintain a better nutritional status during treatment, reflected in fewer malnourished patients, compared to the control group.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Factorial
- Primary Purpose
- Supportive Care
- Masking
- Single (Participant)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- Female
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Women 18 years of age and older.
- •Ability to understand the study and be able to sign the informed consent.
- •Functional stage ECOG 0 -
- •Negative pregnancy test, null reproductive potential, or currently using an contraceptive method.
- •Willing and able to attend the programmed visits.
- •Diagnosed with cervical malignant tumors of epithelial origin in the neck of the uterus, clinical stages IB2-IVA.
- •Candidates to receive concomitant Chemo-Radiotherapy, followed by Brachytherapy.
- •In case of presence of diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension, without retinopathy or albuminuria <300 mg/dl.
- •In case of renal deterioration, a creatinine clearance >20 ml/min.
- •Hemoglobin >10 g/l.
- •Leucocytes > 4000/mm
- •Platelets >100000/mm3.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Under a different nutritional treatment using a nutritional supplement.
- •Carrying other uncontrolled diseases, including cardiovascular insufficiency, arrhythmia, psychiatric illnesses.
- •Concomitant treatment with another experimental drug.
- •Active TB.
- •Infected with HIV.
- •History of LES and other rheumatologic diseases that involve renal deterioration.
- •Presence of vesicular-vaginal fistulae at moment of diagnosis.
- •Previous malignancy.
- •Study Discontinuation Criteria:
- •Loss of follow up for 21 days.
- •Evidence of disease progression.
- •At the request of patient.
- •By unacceptable toxicity.
- •Pregnancy.
- •Criteria must be followed punctually. If a patient were inappropriately included, she must be discontinued from the study.
Arms & Interventions
Dietary modification
Personalized dietary intervention, low residue diet
Intervention: Dietary modification (Other)
Control
Dietary recommendations currently used in the INCan
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in Gastrointestinal toxicity symptoms grading scale using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .
Evaluation of the gastrointestinal symptoms according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4). A grading scale is provided for each adverse event (AE) term. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care activities of daily living. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.
Changes in nutritional status
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .
Evaluation the change of the nutritional status by the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment. The Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment is a questionnaire that comprises 7 sections: weight, intake, symptoms, functional capacity, disease and its relationship to nutritional requirements, metabolic demand and physical evaluation. Based on the previous results the interviewer will define which of the following three groups the individual surveyed belongs to: A: well nourished. B: moderately or suspiciously undernourished. C: severely malnourished.
Changes in food intake
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .
Change in food intake assessed by 24-hour reminder This method consists of questioning the subject to find out everything he or she ingested the day before. It includes three lists of foods to help the interviewee remember, the first is a quick list that contains drinks and foods, the second list contains foods that are commonly forgotten and the interview closes with a detailed description of everything that was consumed
Secondary Outcomes
- Changes in body weight(Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .)
- Change in quality of life for cervical cancer patients: (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cervical cancer module- EORTC QLQ-CX 24)(Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .)
- Changes in handgrip strength measures(Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .)
- Change in quality of life summary score using the the quality of life questionnaire specifically developed for cancer patients (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30 v3))(Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .)
- Changes in body composition (phase angle)(Baseline, 3 weeks after treatment initiation, 12 weeks after treatment initiation and 6 months after treatment initiation .)
Investigators
Dr. Lucely Cetina Pérez
MD, MSc.
National Institute of Cancerología
