Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02871102
NCT02871102
Terminated
Not Applicable

Right-Sizing Tidal Volume in ARDS: Using the Stress Index to Optimize Mechanical Ventilation to Individual Respiratory Mechanics

Vanderbilt University1 site in 1 country4 target enrollmentAugust 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University
Enrollment
4
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized tidal volume
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a widely prevalent and morbid disease for which the current standard treatment is supportive care and avoidance of complications with lung-protective ventilation. Lower-tidal volume ventilation has been largely accepted as a means of lung protective ventilation, but the mechanism for its effectiveness is not yet clear, and debate remains as to how best to choose positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Reduction in driving pressure (plateau pressure minus PEEP) has been suggested as a possible means to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. This protocol aims to identify the range of safe paired-settings of PEEP and tidal volume, with selection guided by driving pressure and the stress index, a tool to recognize potential lung hyperinflation during mechanical ventilation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2016
End Date
December 2017
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Andrew McKown

Fellow in Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Vanderbilt University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
  • Receiving invasive mechanical ventilation via endotracheal or tracheostomy tube
  • Presence of ARDS by Berlin Criteria (acute onset bilateral pulmonary infiltrates incompletely explained by left heart failure together with a PaO2/FiO2 of \<300 or SpO2/FiO2 \<315)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to obtain surrogate consent
  • Presence of specified comorbidities:
  • pre-existing severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, defined as FEV1 documented \< 1L or baseline hypercapnia
  • cerebral edema
  • known intra-cranial abnormality
  • acute coronary syndrome
  • Endotracheal or tracheostomy cuff leak
  • Chest tube with persistent air leak
  • Severe hemodynamic instability (defined as attending judgment that the patient is unable to safely tolerate ventilator manipulations)
  • Presence of spontaneous respiratory activity as evidenced by examination of the ventilator waveform tracing

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized tidal volume

Time Frame: Completion of the study intervention, less than 1 day

Mean absolute difference between tidal volume in cc/kg PBW prescribed by ARDSnet settings on ARDSnet PEEP versus maximal protective tidal volume defined by stress index \<1.05 at the ARDSnet PEEP on experimental protocol.

Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized driving pressure

Time Frame: Completion of the study intervention, less than 1 day

Mean difference in driving pressure prescribed by ARDSnet settings versus at lowest measured possible driving pressure that achieves equivalent minute ventilation as ARDSnet table with respiratory rate \< or = 35 per minute and SI \<1.05.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized PEEP(Completion of the study intervention, less than 1 day)
  • Comparison of ARDSnet-optimized and protocol-optimized elastance(Completion of the study intervention, less than 1 day)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials