A clinical study to evaluate the difference between weight based criteria and cricoid-mental distance based criteria for LMA proseal size selection in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 3: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/12/038728
- Lead Sponsor
- Maulana Azad medical college
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
ASA grade I, II
-Aged 18 to 60 years
-body mass index (BMI) 18 - 30kg/m2
Expected duration of surgery less than 3 hours
Exclusion Criteria
-Patients with high risk of regurgitation or aspiration
-Patients with an anticipated difficult airway (including but not limited to a history of difficulty airway, mouth opening <2.5 cm, Mallampati class 4, limited neck extension or cervical spine pathology)
-Known respiratory tract pathology
-Planned surgery in lateral / prone position
-Patients requiring endotracheal intubation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Insertion success at first attempt <br/ ><br>Timepoint: From baseline to time of insertion <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method umber of Attempts at Proseal insertionTimepoint: 1st attempt, 2 nd attempt, 3rd attempt. <br/ ><br>;Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: During monitoring of patient once the proseal LMA is in situ. <br/ ><br>;Time to successful insertionTimepoint: the interval beginning with picking up the airway device and ending when a successful airway device placement;Ease of insertionTimepoint: graded from 1 to 4 (1 for no resistance, 2 for mild resistance, 3 for moderate resistance, 4 for unable to placement) by the operator who performed the insertion <br/ ><br>