MedPath

ElderTree Smart System for Older Adults

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Pain
Interventions
Behavioral: Treatment as usual (TAU)
Behavioral: ElderTree on laptop (ET- LT)
Behavioral: ElderTree on smart system (ET- SS)
Registration Number
NCT04798196
Lead Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Brief Summary

Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills.

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether voice-activated "smart" technology increases adoption and sustains use of an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, or ET) for older adults with multiple chronic conditions, and thereby improves its potential to widely enhance quality of life and health outcomes. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

An Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ)-funded randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that ET improved quality of life and other factors among high users of primary care with multiple chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. However, many people did not use it extensively, which is a common problem with all web apps.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
268
Inclusion Criteria
  • Be ≥60 years old;
  • Have been treated in University of Wisconsin (UW) Health clinics, with no plans to leave during the study period (only relevant for UW Health patients, not patients recruited from the community);
  • Have a chronic pain diagnosis AND a medical diagnoses of three or more of the following common chronic conditions: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, BMI 30+, cancer, chronic kidney disease, depression, osteoporosis, arthritis, or dizziness/falls/loss of vestibular function;
  • Be willing to share healthcare use (e.g. 30-day readmissions) in electronic health records (only relevant for UW Health patients, not patients recruited from the community); and
  • Allow researchers to share information about a patient's health status with their primary care physician (PCP).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Require an interpreter

  • Have a medical diagnosis of any of the following:

    • Alzheimer's
    • Schizophrenia/other psychotic disorders
    • Dementia
    • Autism spectrum disorder
    • Known terminal illness with less than 6 months to live
    • Acute medical problem requiring immediate hospitalization

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control groupTreatment as usual (TAU)Participants will receive treatment as usual (TAU).
ElderTree on laptop (ET- LT)ElderTree on laptop (ET- LT)Participants will receive ElderTree on a laptop.
ElderTree on smart system (ET- SS)ElderTree on smart system (ET- SS)Participants will receive ElderTree on a smart system.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v2.1 - Pain Interference ScoreBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Pain interference was measured using the 4-item subscale from the PROMIS 29. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. Scoring of individual items varies and is calculated by the scale's developers; with higher values indicating more pain interference. The possible range is 41.1 to 76.3 (PROMIS scores reported here have weighted ranges).

Change in PROMIS Short Form v2.1 - Psychosocial Quality of Life ScoreBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Psychosocial quality of life was measured using the 12-item subscale from the PROMIS 29. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. Scoring of individual items varies and is calculated by the scale's developers; with higher values indicating better quality of life. The possible range is 21.2 to 67.6.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Health DistressBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Health distress was measured using the 4-item Lorig Health Distress Scale. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past month. The measure was scored by averaged the items; with higher values indicating more health distress. Possible range is 0 to 5.

ElderTree Days of Usebaseline to 4 months, and 4 months to 8 months

Days of ElderTree use within a 4 month period before their survey date. The possible range for days of ElderTree use is 0 to 120.

Physical Quality of LifeBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Physical quality of life was measured using the 12-item subscale from the PROMIS 29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Health. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. Scoring of individual items varies and is calculated by the scale's developers; with higher values indicating more physical quality of life. The possible range is 16.2-67.7.

Pain IntensityBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Pain intensity was measured using a single item subscale from the PROMIS 29 (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Global Health. The item asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. The raw score of the item was used (range: 0-10); with higher values indicating more pain intensity.

Number of Participants Readmitted Within 30-daysBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

30-day readmissions were measured using a single item asking participants to answer regarding the past 4 months. The raw score, answering yes/no to having a 30-day readmission, was used. Those participants answering 'yes' to being readmitted in the last 30 days are reported for each time point.

Well-beingBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Well-being was measured using the 5-items World Health Organization (WHO) Well-Being Index. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. The measure was scored by summing the items; with higher values indicating better well-being. Possible range is 0 to 25.

LonelinessBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Loneliness was measured using the 5-item NIH Toolbox Social Relationship Scale Loneliness. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past month. Scoring of individual items varies and is calculated by the scale's developers; with higher values indicating more Loneliness. Possible range is 20 to 80.

IrritabilityBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Irritability was measured using the 5-item Brief Irritability Test. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 7 days. The measure was scored by summing the items; with higher values indicating more irritability. Possible range is 5 to 30.

Communication With PhysiciansBaseline, 4 months, 8 months

Communication with physicians was measured using the 3-item Lorig Communication with Physicians. The items asked participants to answer regarding the past 4 months. The measure was scored by averaging the items; with higher values indicating better communication with the healthcare provider. Possible range is 0 to 5.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

🇺🇸

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath