MedPath

Comparison of success rate of topical versus intravenous lignocaine for insertion of Laryngeal mask airway with propofol

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Condition 1: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
Registration Number
CTRI/2022/11/047181
Lead Sponsor
Sawai Mansingh Medical College and Hospital
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1.Patients willing to give written informed

consent.

2.Age 18 to 45 years.

3.Patients with ASA grade I and II.

Exclusion Criteria

? patients refusing consent to participate in the study

? patients allergic to propofol and/or lignocaine

? obesity(bmi >30)

? anticipated difficult airway

? Respiratory/cerebriovascular/cardiovascular and renal diseases including hypertension

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary Objective of present study is to determine the conditions for LMA insertion.Timepoint: 30 secs after giving Propofol in both the groups respective.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean systolic blood pressure <br/ ><br>Mean diastolic blood pressure <br/ ><br>Mean arterial pressure <br/ ><br>Mean heart rate <br/ ><br>Mean of proportion of cases experiencing coughing, laryngospasm, gagging. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: These parameters were recorded according to scheduled times: <br/ ><br> T0 Base line reading <br/ ><br> T1 Thirty seconds after <br/ ><br> induction with propofol <br/ ><br> T2 one minute <br/ ><br> T3 Two minutes <br/ ><br> T4 Three minutes <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath