Combination of Static Echocardiographic Indices for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness During Cardiac Surgery

Completed

• Conditions: Fluid Responsiveness

• Registration Number: NCT03222778
• Lead Sponsor: Yonsei University

Brief Summary

In the perioperative or critical care of hemodynamically unstable patients, appropriate fluid resuscitation guided by reliable preload indices is of pivotal importance as only half of them are fluid responsive, and that empiric fluid administration actually leads to dismal prognosis. In the continuum of being non-invasive, combinations of tissue Doppler-derived parameters of early (e') and late (a') diastolic, and peak systolic velocity (s') of the mitral annulus provide information regarding the systolic dysfunction and preload (e'/s'), and LV stiffness (e'/a'). Although the left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) alone is not a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness, combining LVEDA with these indices would provide comprehensive information regarding the LV dimension, preload, and compliance as well as systolic function. Also, it seems logical to assume that patients with low LVEDA and high e' velocity indicating preserved early diastolic relaxation or low e (early mitral inflow velocity) /e' ratio indicating normal LV filling pressure would more likely be fluid responsive. Yet, these assumptions have not been tested before. Moreover, these values can be reliably obtained regardless of the heart rhythm, except for a', and do not completely rely on heart-lung interaction as opposed to the dynamic indices. Thus, the aim of this prospective trial is to investigate the role of LVEDA combined with e, e', a' or s' as a preload index in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery, in closed-chest conditions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-07-09
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-07-17
• Study First Posted: 2017-07-19
• Study Start: 2017-12-01
• Status Verified: 2020-03
• Primary Completion: 2020-03-06
• Study Completion: 2020-03-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2020-03-26
• Last Update Posted: 2020-03-27

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 66

Inclusion Criteria

1. the patients scheduled for off-pump coronary bypass surgery
2. tha age ≥20 yrs old
3. the patients who are willing to provide written informed consent

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

heart rhythm other than sinus, L, septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities, and a

1. New York Heart Association functional class ≥III
2. LV ejection fraction <40%
3. emergency operation
4. the patients with preoperative septal and/or lateral wall motion abnormalities
5. contraindications to transesophageal echocardiography or balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4
6. the patients with any valvular heart disease ≥moderate degree
7. No communication possible due to a language barrier or deafness

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Predictive ability of combined echocardiographic index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a'	15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition	Fluid challenge is performed once using 6 ml/kg of balanced 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (Volulyte; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) 15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition. Fluid responsiveness is defined as an increase in stroke volume index of ≥ 15%. Assessment of echocardiographic variables \[LVEDA, e, e', a' or s'\] is performed before fluid challenge. We assess the predictive ability of a combined echocardiographic preload index consisting of LVEDA, e, e', s' or a' on fluid responsiveness using the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUROC).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Comparison between the combine echocardiographic index and LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV for the predictive ability on fluid responsiveness	15 to 20 min after anesthetic induction during closed chest condition	CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV are measured as well as echocardiographic variables \[LVEDA, e, e', a' or s'\] before fluid challenge. We also assess the predictive ability of LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV and PPV on fluid responsiveness using each AUROC, and compare the predictive power of the combined echocardiographic index on fluid responsiveness with those of the LVEDA alone, CVP, PCWP, RVEDV, and PPV.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; 🇰🇷 Seoul, Korea, Republic of