Optimal Catheter Length for Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Vascular Access
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 22
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Extravasation rates
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare catheter length and extravasation rates for Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter insertion in a subset of emergency department patients with difficult IV access. Physicians, Emergency RNs, and Emergency Technicians can be taught to use US guidance to start peripheral IV in the ED. The optimal length of catheter to use for this procedure is unknown. This study will provide data on the length of catheter required to minimize extravasation. There is no guideline on catheter length selection for US-guided peripheral vascular access. This study may decrease extravasation rates for US-guided peripheral vascular access by providing guidance on catheter length selection.
详细描述
The purpose of this study is to compare catheter length and extravasation rates for US guided peripheral IV insertion in a subset of emergency department patients with difficult IV access. Physicians, Emergency RNs, and Emergency Technicians can be taught to use US guidance to start peripheral IV in the ED. The optimal length of catheter to use for this procedure is unknown. This study will provide data on the length of catheter required to minimize extravasation. There is no guideline on catheter length selection for US-guided peripheral vascular access. This study may decrease extravasation rates for US-guided peripheral vascular access by providing guidance on catheter length selection.
The study design is a randomized non-blinded clinical trial of extravasation rates of US guided peripheral vascular access related to intravenous catheter length and venous depth in the ED. Primary endpoint is duration of usable vascular access. Secondary endpoints are catheter length, venous depth, time of procedure, successful cannulation, reasons for failure, number of skin punctures, site of cannulation, sonographic technique, type of provider obtaining access and complications.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •two failed traditional IV attempts by a nurse
- •need for IV access as determined by the treating physician
- •age 18 and greater
排除标准
- •less than age 18
- •subjects needing a central venous catheter
- •patients unable to provide informed consent
结局指标
主要结局
Extravasation rates
时间窗: 48 hours
compare catheter length and extravasation rates for US guided peripheral IV insertion in a subset of emergency department patients with difficult IV access
次要结局
未报告次要终点
