MedPath

Late LTP-like Plasticity Effects of tDCS in Chronic Stroke Patients

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hemiparesis
Stroke
Interventions
Device: Sham
Device: Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS
Device: Conventional Paired tDCS
Device: Conventional Unpaired tDCS
Registration Number
NCT02399540
Lead Sponsor
Erasmus Medical Center
Brief Summary

Rationale: About 80% of stroke patients suffer motor impairments, but current therapies have limited effects on motor recovery. Therefore, investigating new potential therapeutic approaches is crucial. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive electrical stimulation where a weak current is applied through electrodes over the scalp. This stimulation is known to (1) induce changes in neuronal excitability -which can last up to one day with late LTP-like plasticity protocols- in a polarity and site-specific manner, and (2) facilitate motor learning and stroke recovery. However, it is unknown how the motor cortex excitability changes that follow tDCS relate to the increase in motor learning and recovery potential. The currently upheld hypothesis is that motor learning needs to be synchronized in time with electrical stimulation (paired stimulation), but recent results from our lab suggest that tDCS also increases skill learning after stimulation has ended (unpaired stimulation). If this is true, tDCS has a much larger therapeutic window and is a more valuable clinical tool than currently believed. Therefore, the investigators want to investigate how late LTP-like plasticity tDCS affects the increase in skill learning normally seen with tDCS when applied 24 hours before training. The outcome of this study can provide important guidelines on effective motor therapy during stroke rehabilitation.

Objective: Identify the effect of late LTP-like plasticity tDCS in chronic stroke patients on skill learning 24 hours later.

Study design: Double-blinded, randomized between-subjects trials. Study population: Chronic stroke patients. Main study parameters/endpoints: The main objective of the study is to determine the effect of late LTP-like plasticity tDCS on skill learning 24 hours later. As a motor learning paradigm, the investigators will use a circuit tracking task which chronic stroke patients perform better if tDCS is applied concurrently. During this task, patients have to trace a cursor over a circuit as fast and accurately as possible by moving a computer mouse. Skill will be quantified by calculating a combined speed/ accuracy score and skill improvement compared to baseline (LI; the learning index) will be compared between the sham, conventional unpaired tDCS, conventional paired tDCS groups and the late LTP-like plasticity tDCS groups.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  • Chronic (> 6 months) stroke patient
  • Aged 18-79 years
  • Motor deficit in the upper limb due to the stroke
Exclusion Criteria
  • Absence of recordable MEPs from the ADM after TMS
  • Absence of voluntary movement (Fugl-Meyer < III)
  • Head injury or the presence of intracranial metal or intracranial lesions
  • History of cranial irradiation
  • History of epilepsy
  • Presence of a pacemaker
  • Taking anticonvulsant or neuroleptic medication
  • Substance abuse
  • Inability to understand instructions
  • History of psychiatric disorders

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ShamShamDay 1: sham stimulation Day 2: sham stimulation
Late LTP-like Plasticity tDCSLate LTP-like Plasticity tDCSDay 1: late LTP-like Plasticity tDCS Day 2: sham stimulation
Conventional Paired tDCSConventional Paired tDCSDay 1: sham stimulation Day 2: conventional tDCS
Conventional Unpaired tDCSConventional Unpaired tDCSDay 1: conventional tDCS Day 2: sham stimulation
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor Skill RetentionDay 9

Motor skill retention will be assessed on the circuit game

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Maximum Grip ForceDay 1 and Day 9

Maximum Grip Force will be assessed using a Jamar Dynamometer

Purdue Pegboard TestDay 1 and Day 9

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rijndam

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath