Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04204356
NCT04204356CompletedNot Applicable

The Effect of Speech and Language Therapy With and Without Transcranial Direct-current Stimulation on Discourse Production in People With Post-stroke Aphasia: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

King's College London1 site in 1 country6 target enrollmentStarted: November 25, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
6
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Verb token total

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Aphasia is a language impairment caused by brain injury such as stroke that affects the ability to understand and express language, read and write due to damage in the language regions of the brain. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques like transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) have been found to improve aphasia treatment effects in post stroke patient populations such as improved naming abilities.

However, the effect of tDCS on more functional, higher level language skills such as discourse production (i.e. story telling, giving instructions) has yet to be understood.Therefore the aim of this study is to determine the potential effectiveness of tDCS as an adjunct to speech and language therapy (SLT) to improve discourse speech production in people with post-stroke aphasia. It is hypothesised that SLT combined with tDCS will result in greater improvements in discourse language production compared to SLT on its own.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •aphasia caused by a single stroke
  • •at least 6 months post stroke
  • •at least 18 years old
  • •competent English speaker prior to stroke
  • •right handed prior to stroke
  • •normal aided or unaided visual acuity
  • •willing to participate and to comply with the proposed block of intervention and testing regime.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Persons with
  • •neurological symptoms or history of a neurological event other than their stroke
  • •contraindications to tDCS including history of epilepsy or seizures and pacemakers
  • •global/severe aphasia
  • •cognitive impairment identified by a score less than 20/30 in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment
  • •left-handed dominance prior to stroke
  • •visual problems which interfere with persons' ability to access visual materials (i.e. pictures)
  • •inability to attend sessions

Arms & Interventions

tDCS group

Experimental

Participants randomly allocated to this group using a random number generator will receive a once weekly, 6-week block of language treatment with active tDCS.

Intervention: Language treatment for improving discourse production (Behavioral)

tDCS group

Experimental

Participants randomly allocated to this group using a random number generator will receive a once weekly, 6-week block of language treatment with active tDCS.

Intervention: Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) (Device)

Sham group

Sham Comparator

Participants randomly allocated to this group using a random number generator will receive a once weekly, 6-week block of language treatment without active tDCS (sham)

Intervention: Language treatment for improving discourse production (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Verb token total

Time Frame: 30 minutes

The number of all verb occurrences in a language sample

Verb type total

Time Frame: 30 minutes

The number of distinct verbs in a sample

Secondary Outcomes

  • Total number of utterances(30 minutes)
  • Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI)(10 minutes)
  • Total number of words(30 minutes)
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)(10 minutes)
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)(15 minutes)
  • Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 (AIQ)(15 minutes)
  • Predicate argument structure (PAS)(30 minutes)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials