MedPath

A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Heterozygous Familial
Hypercholesterolemia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01475825
Lead Sponsor
Kastle Therapeutics, LLC
Brief Summary

Primary objective:

Determine whether mipomersen (ISIS 301012) significantly reduces atherogenic lipid levels in patients with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (severe HeFH), defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥200 mg/dL plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents (referred to as Cohort 1) compared to placebo. Two different mipomersen dosing regimens will be studied: subcutaneous (SC) mipomersen 200 mg once weekly versus placebo, and SC mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly versus placebo.

Secondary Objectives:

* Determine whether there are qualitative differences between the safety profiles of the 2 dosing regimens and placebo in Cohort 1, patients with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and \<200 mg/dL plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents (referred to as Cohort 2), and the overall study population

* Determine whether there are qualitative differences between the tolerability of the 2 dosing regimens and placebo in Cohort 1, Cohort 2, and the overall study population

* Further characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the 2 dosing regimens in Cohort 1, Cohort 2, and the overall study population

* Determine whether the 2 mipomersen dosing regimens significantly reduce atherogenic lipid levels in Cohort 2 compared to placebo

* Obtain additional data regarding ongoing safety and efficacy of mipomersen in patients with FH and inadequately controlled LDL-C who complete the primary efficacy assessment visit (PET) in the Blinded Treatment Period and continue treatment in Open-Label Continuation Period

Detailed Description

The study consisted of a Screening period of up to 4 weeks, Blinded Treatment Phase of 60 weeks, Open-Label Continuation Period of 26 weeks, and Post-Treatment Phase of 24 weeks.

Study Design, masking - Study treatment was blinded (double-blinded) through the Primary Efficacy Assessment Visit in the Blinded Treatment Period. Study treatment was open-label in the Open-Label Continuation Period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
309
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L) or LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents, or diagnosis of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L) and <200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L))
  • On stable, maximally tolerated, statin therapy for at least 12 weeks or if statin intolerant, on at least 1 medication from another class of hypolipidemic agents (i.e., bile acid sequestrants, niacin/nicotinic acid, cholesterol absorption inhibitors, fibrates).
  • On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2 and stable weight for > 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
  • Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
  • Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Regimen A: Mipomersenmipomersen sodium 200 mgSubcutaneous injection of mipomersen 200 mg once weekly
Regimen A: PlaceboPlaceboPlacebo matching subcutaneous injection once weekly.
Regimen B: Mipomersenmipomersen sodium 70 mgSubcutaneous injection of mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly.
Regimen B: PlaceboPlaceboPlacebo matching subcutaneous injection thrice weekly.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61

The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 1, which included participants with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Severe HeFH was defined as LDL-C levels ≥200 mg/deciliter (dL) plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61

The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.

Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61

The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.

Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2Baseline, PET (up to 60 weeks)

The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 2, which included participants with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and \<200 mg/dL, plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.

Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1Baseline and Week 61

The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.

Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 2Baseline and Week 61

The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath