MedPath

Shave Margins vs. Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: Partial mastectomy plus additional Shave Margin
Procedure: Partial mastectomy
Registration Number
NCT02772731
Lead Sponsor
Yale University
Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women in the US. Surgical management is the mainstay of therapy, and in general consists of resection of the primary tumor with either a partial mastectomy (aka "lumpectomy") or a total mastectomy.

The investigators hypothesize that routine shave margins during partial mastectomy will significantly reduce positive margin rate. A positive margin means that cancerous cells were detected at the edge of the excised area. This generally mandates a return to the operating room for re-excision.

Detailed Description

Some authors have investigated, in a retrospective fashion, the use of routine shave margins, where surgeons routinely take additional margins at the time of the initial partial mastectomy as a means of obtaining negative margins. While these retrospective studies have found that positive margin rates declined using this technique, opponents to this technique wonder if this truly results in a higher negative margin rate without compromising cosmesis or increasing tissue volume removed. As these studies were retrospective, it was possible that the initial resection was smaller than what those who do not routinely take shave margins would resect. No one had evaluated the impact of further resection on operative time, nor in a blinded fashion, evaluated cosmesis. Further, there had yet to be a prospective study to evaluate the impact of this on local recurrence rates. Hence, the investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial of this technique at Yale. The data from this study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the technique cut positive margin and re-excision rates in half. Some wondered, however, about the external generalizability of these findings, particularly in non-academic settings. Hence, a multicenter trial to validate these findings is warranted.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
400
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Shave MarginPartial mastectomy plus additional Shave MarginAfter partial mastectomy, patients will be subject to intraoperative randomization to the shave margin group where additional tissue will be resected.
No Shave MarginPartial mastectomyAfter partial mastectomy, patients will be subject to intraoperative randomization to the no shave margin group, where after initial surgery, no further tissue will be removed.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Positive margin rateimmediately after surgery

The effect is positive margin rate post-surgery as measured by local pathological reports. Positive margins were defined as tumor touching the edge of the specimen that was removed in patients with invasive cancer and tumor that was within 2 mm of the edge of the specimen removed in those with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of Life assessment5 years post-op about the last seven days

Quality of Life Questionnaire measures quality of life over the past 7 days and includes 75 questions that are answered on a Likert scale. Questions assess physical, social, emotional and functional well-being in addition to cosmetic and physical appearance and questions regarding the surgery. Higher scores indicate a higher quality of life.

local recurrence ratesup to 5 years

Patients will be assessed for local recurrence based on physical examination, mammography, and follow up phone calls. This is a composite score with only one outcome and only one unit (respondents). A positive results from any of these methods indicates recurrence.

patient perceived cosmesis5 years post-op

Subjects will be asked their perception of physical appearance: poor, fair, good, or excellent.

volume of tissue resectedimmediately after tissue resection

based on the sum of the volumes of tissue excised as found in the gross description of the specimens on the pathology report.

Trial Locations

Locations (9)

Loma Linda University Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Loma Linda, California, United States

William Beaumont Hospital

🇺🇸

Troy, Michigan, United States

UNC Chapel Hill

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Watson Clinic Cancer and Research Center

🇺🇸

Lakeland, Florida, United States

Cleveland Clinic Akron General

🇺🇸

Akron, Ohio, United States

Women & Infants Hospital

🇺🇸

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Wake Forest School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Doctors Hospital at Renaissance

🇺🇸

Edinburg, Texas, United States

Thomas Jefferson University

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath