Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02772731
NCT02772731
Completed
Not Applicable

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Routine Shave Margins vs. Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients

Yale University9 sites in 1 country400 target enrollmentJuly 2016
ConditionsBreast Cancer

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Sponsor
Yale University
Enrollment
400
Locations
9
Primary Endpoint
Positive margin rate
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women in the US. Surgical management is the mainstay of therapy, and in general consists of resection of the primary tumor with either a partial mastectomy (aka "lumpectomy") or a total mastectomy.

The investigators hypothesize that routine shave margins during partial mastectomy will significantly reduce positive margin rate. A positive margin means that cancerous cells were detected at the edge of the excised area. This generally mandates a return to the operating room for re-excision.

Detailed Description

Some authors have investigated, in a retrospective fashion, the use of routine shave margins, where surgeons routinely take additional margins at the time of the initial partial mastectomy as a means of obtaining negative margins. While these retrospective studies have found that positive margin rates declined using this technique, opponents to this technique wonder if this truly results in a higher negative margin rate without compromising cosmesis or increasing tissue volume removed. As these studies were retrospective, it was possible that the initial resection was smaller than what those who do not routinely take shave margins would resect. No one had evaluated the impact of further resection on operative time, nor in a blinded fashion, evaluated cosmesis. Further, there had yet to be a prospective study to evaluate the impact of this on local recurrence rates. Hence, the investigators performed a prospective randomized controlled trial of this technique at Yale. The data from this study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that the technique cut positive margin and re-excision rates in half. Some wondered, however, about the external generalizability of these findings, particularly in non-academic settings. Hence, a multicenter trial to validate these findings is warranted.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2016
End Date
November 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Positive margin rate

Time Frame: immediately after surgery

The effect is positive margin rate post-surgery as measured by local pathological reports. Positive margins were defined as tumor touching the edge of the specimen that was removed in patients with invasive cancer and tumor that was within 2 mm of the edge of the specimen removed in those with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Quality of Life assessment(5 years post-op about the last seven days)
  • local recurrence rates(up to 5 years)
  • patient perceived cosmesis(5 years post-op)
  • volume of tissue resected(immediately after tissue resection)

Study Sites (9)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials