跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01717573
NCT01717573已完成不适用

Randomised Controlled Study to Assess Whether Deferred Stenting in Acute STEMI Patients Might Reduce the Incidence of No-reflow Versus Conventional Treatment with Immediate Stenting

NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 101 人开始时间: 2012年3月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
101
试验地点
1
主要终点
Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groups

研究概览

简要总结

During primary PCI, stent deployment and post-dilatation are associated with no-reflow. The mechanisms for no reflow include distal embolization of thrombus, enhanced thrombus formation and vascular spasm. No reflow is associated with risk factors such as prolonged duration of ischaemia, heavy thrombus burden, persistent ST elevation and long stent length. ACTIVE HYPOTHESIS: once normal antegrade flow has been re-established with initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty at the beginning of primary PCI, compared with usual care with direct stenting, a strategy of deferred stenting for 4 -16 hours to permit the beneficial effects of normalized coronary blood flow and anti-thrombotic therapies will reduce the incidence of no reflow in at-risk STEMI patients. DESIGN: In consecutive STEMI patients with risk factors for no reflow and who have given informed consent, when normal flow has been established (TIMI 3) by initial aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, participants will be randomized to deferred stenting or usual care with direct stenting. All patients will receive dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients who are randomized to deferred stenting will receive intravenous glycoprotein IIbIIIa inhibitor and anti-coagulation with low molecular weight heparin. Patients who are screened and not eligible to be randomized will be prospectively entered into a registry. Study assessments for feasibility, safety and efficacy will be prospectively performed. An independent clinical event committee will review all serious adverse events. Study endpoints will be subject to core laboratory analyses. The study is intended to inform the design of a larger multicentre clinical trial.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Rescue PCI
  • •Prolonged ischaemic time (> 12hours)
  • •Previous MI
  • •Age > 65
  • •Occluded artery (TIMI 0/1) at initial angiography
  • •Thrombus burden (TIMI grade 2+)
  • •Long plaque/ stent length (> 24 mm)
  • •Severe coronary artery disease (e.g calcified artery)
  • •Small reference vessel diameter (< 2.5 mm)
  • •Persistent ST-elevation (> 50%) following reperfusion
  • •Index of microvascular resistance (IMR) > 40

排除标准

  • •Absence of normal coronary flow (TIMI 3)

研究组 & 干预措施

Deferred stenting

Active Comparator

During primary PCI in STEMI, when TIMI 3 flow has been re-established with guide-wire, aspiration thrombectomy and/or balloon angioplasty, stenting is then deferred for a period of 4-16 hours following reperfusion. During this time, patients remain in the Coronary Care Unit and will receive intravenous tirofiban and subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (enoxaparin 1 mg/kg)

干预措施: Deferred stenting (Procedure)

Conventional treatment

Sham Comparator

Conventional treatment in STEMI, with immediate stenting

干预措施: Conventional treatment (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Incidence of angiographic no-reflow/ slow-reflow (TIMI flow grade < 3) in the deferred and conventional treatment groups

时间窗: Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours)

次要结局

  • Clinical events (hospitalisation for heart failure, re-infarction, cardiac death)(Assessed at index admission and 6-months)
  • Change in LV ejection fraction(Cardiac MRI 2 days and 6-months post PCI)
  • Extent of late microvascular obstruction (MVO) assessed by cardiac MRI(MRI 2-5 days post randomisation)
  • Angiographic tissue myocardial blush grade(Angiographic myocardial blush grade at the end of the first procedure (both groups) and at the end of the second procedure in the deferred group)
  • TIMI coronary arter flow grade(At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group)
  • Culprit vessel dimensions (QCA) and thrombus burden(Initial coronary angiogram (and 2nd angiogram in deferred group))
  • Corrected TIMI frame count(At the beginning and end of the first procedure (for both groups) and at the beginning and end of the second procedure in the deferred group)
  • Degree of adverse remodelling (end-systolic and end-diastolic volume index)(Cardiac MRI at 6-months)
  • Final infarct size and myocardial salvage(Assessed from cardiac MRI day 2-5 and cardiac MRI at 6months)
  • Degree of ST-segment resolution on ECG(ECG in cath-lab prior to reperfusion and again 60 mins post-reperfusion)
  • Index of microvascular resistance (IMR)(Assessed following stent deployment (initial procedure for the conventional group and 2nd procedure for the deferred group))
  • Intra-procedural thrombotic events(Asessed during the 1st (both groups) and 2nd procedures (deferred group) (0-16 hours))

研究者

发起方
NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Colin Berry

Consultant Cardiologist

NHS National Waiting Times Centre Board

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验