MedPath

Use Test: Dermowas Body Lotion pH 4 vs. pH 5.8

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
Other: WO 5000
Other: WO 5001
Registration Number
NCT04538183
Lead Sponsor
Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel
Brief Summary

The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce inflammation in healthy individuals.

Detailed Description

Previous studies have shown that an emollient adjusted to pH 4 has favorable effects to the skin of aged individuals. The objective of the study was to examine whether normalizing of the pH by acidification through topical treatment helps to strengthen the skin barrier, to induce epidermal differentiation and to reduce Inflammation. The effect of a cosmetic oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion adjusted to pH 4 in comparison to the same emulsion adjusted to pH 5.8 on the integrity of the skin barrier and the mechanical stability was examined in healthy volunteers from age 18 to 75 years.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male and female volunteers (75 % women and 25 % men)
  • Aged 18 - 75 years
  • Healthy skin
  • Informed consent was given
Exclusion Criteria
  • Atopic diathesis, atopic dermatitis and other skin diseases with a disrupted skin barrier
  • Dermatitis and other skin diseases in the test site
  • Birthmarks, tattoos, scars and other abnormalities in the test site, which may influence the measurements
  • Women: pregnancy and breastfeeding
  • Known contact sensitization
  • Severe systemic diseases
  • Regular use of sauna and solarium
  • Intensive UV exposure
  • Topical use of drugs in the test site four weeks before and during the study
  • Systemic administration of anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating and antibiotic drugs
  • Previous participation in other studies within the last month before the study
  • Alcohol and drug misuse
  • Missing awareness and inability to follow the instructions of the study staff
  • Other reasons which according to the study leader speak against the participation in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
WO 5000WO 5000Body lotion pH 4 for topical application
WO 5001WO 5001Body lotion pH 5.8 for topical application
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change of transepidermal water loss (TEWL)Change from day 1 (before application) to day 30

Tewameter TM300, Courage \& Khazaka, Köln

Change of erythemaChange from Day 1 to day 30 + 2 hours (after tape-stripping), measured over 3 timepoints (Day 1, day 30 and day 30 +2 hours (after tape stripping)

Visible score adapted from Frosch and Kligman: 0 = no redness, 0.5 = very slight redness, 1 = slight patchy or diffuse redness, 2 = moderate even redness, 3 = profound redness

Tape-strippingDay 31

Number of the tape-strips until a threefold increase in TEWL compared to unstripped baseline value is reached. (D-Squame® (DSQ), CuDerm Corporation, Dallas)

Corneocyte sizeDay 31

After staining with Nile Red by immunofluorescence microscopy and digital imaging

Amount of the cytokine IL-1αDay 31

Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Change of skin hydrationChange from day 1 (before application) to day 30

Corneometer CM 825, Courage \& Khazaka, Köln

Change of pHChange from Baseline to day 31, measured over 5 time points (Day 1, day 30, day 30+3 hours, day 30+6 hours and day 31)

pH-Meter 910, Courage \& Khazaka, Köln

Amount of antimicrobial peptide hBD-2Day 31

Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Universitäts-Hautklinik Kiel

🇩🇪

Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath