Toothbrush Wear and Its Effect on Subgingival Inflammation Using Two Different Brushing Techniques

Not Applicable

Completed

Brief Summary: Toothbrush plaque removal, along with interproximal flossing, helps to maintain the oral cavity free from periodontal diseases and dental caries. Although techniques such as the Bass Technique (BT), the Modified Bass Technique (MBT) and the Modified Stillman Technique (MST) are taught to dental students, dental hygiene students, and dental assistants, there is little evidence to discern which technique is more effective in reducing or preventing gingival inflammation.

At Tufts University School of Dental Medicine (TUSDM), a modification of the Bass intrasulcular technique is advocated to many students. We call this modification of the Bass technique a Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT), which is an intrasulcular technique that maintains the toothbrush bristle ends essentially stationary on the tooth cervically and in the gingival crevice.

In this study, half of the participants were taught the Stationary Bristle Technique Group, while the other half were not be provided with instructions, but asked to brush as normal (non-interventional group) throughout the duration of the study.

Detailed Description: This is a double-armed, randomized clinical trial. The primary aim of this study is to compare whether a Stationary Brushing Technique (SBT) is more effective in the reduction of gingival inflammation than permitting people to brush the way they normally do without instruction (Non-Stationary Brushing Technique).

Gingival inflammation is evidenced by the percentage (%) sites with Bleeding on Probing (BoP). The primary time-point will be at 4 weeks.

The amount of toothbrush bristle deformation at 4 weeks, 12, and 16 weeks of brushing with a SBT and with a NSBT will also be evaluated. 3. The secondary evaluation of BoP will be at the 12 and 16 week time-point.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must be at least 18 years of age
Subjects must have at least 20 teeth
Subjects must have had a professional dental prophylaxis done in the 3 months prior to the beginning of the study
Subjects exhibiting 10% or greater BoP at the baseline examination

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects wearing fixed orthodontic appliances (including lingual retainers or Invisalign®)
Subjects who smoke (=more than 0 cigarettes a day)
Subjects who received antibiotic treatment during the month prior to the beginning of the study
Subjects who have cervical probing depth (PD) greater than 3mm
Subjects diagnosed with periodontal disease at any site as defined bleeding on probing with cervical probing depths greater than 3 mm and loss of cervical attachment.
Subjects who are currently pregnant (self-report).

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Stationary Bristle Technique (SBT)	Instructed Brushing Method	Instructed brushing method. Participants are asked to brush twice daily, for 2 minutes at a time, following instructions for the Stationary Bristle Technique.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Gingival Inflammation	From Baseline up to 4 weeks	Measured by the percentage of sites with BoP. The percentage of sites with BoP at each time point will be calculated by group

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in BoP	From baseline up to 16 weeks	The secondary evaluation of BoP will be at the 12 and 16 week time-point.
Toothbrush Bristle Deformation	From baseling up to 16 weeks	Toothbrush bristle deformation will be measured at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks of brushing with SBT or NSBT. The mean and standard deviation of the deformation measurements (length and width) will be calculated at each time point for each group.

Locations (1): Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
🇺🇸
Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Receive instant email notifications about changes in this clinical trial

Receive instant email notifications about changes in this clinical trial