CTRI/2023/02/049861
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A
A comparative study of the efficacy of Spinal Anaesthesiawith Hyperbaric Ropivacaine 0.75oh and HyperbaricBupivacaine 0.5Yo in patients undergoing infraumbilicalsurgeries. - In spinal , bupivacaine versus ropivacaine
Jitendra kalbande0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Sponsor
- Jitendra kalbande
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18\- 60 years ,ASA 1 and 2 both male and female, duration of surgery \- minimum 1 hr
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with contraindication to spinal anaesthesia, allergy to drug being used, patient with neurological deficit, pregnancy women
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of general and spinal anesthesia on the body's defense systems in diabetic patientsDiabetes.Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusIRCT201402208384N3Vice Chancellor for Research, Mashhad University of Medical Science63
Completed
N/A
The anesthesia effect on serum levels and gene expression of interleukins in elective cesarean sectioIRCT20180304038943N1Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences40
Recruiting
Phase 3
The effect of general and spinal anesthesia on the level of inflammatory factors in hysterectomy surgeryInflammatory factors after hysterectomy.Abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding, unspecifiedN93.9IRCT20190819044559N4Kerman University of Medical Sciences42
Completed
N/A
A pilot study comparing general versus spinal anaesthesia for vaginal surgeryISRCTN76637086niversity Hospital of North Staffordshire (UK)80
Completed
Phase 3
The efficacy of exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic LBPACTRN12605000053628niversity of Sydney240