CTRI/2023/02/049861
Not yet recruiting
未知
A comparative study of the efficacy of Spinal Anaesthesiawith Hyperbaric Ropivacaine 0.75oh and HyperbaricBupivacaine 0.5Yo in patients undergoing infraumbilicalsurgeries. - In spinal , bupivacaine versus ropivacaine
Jitendra kalbande0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
- Sponsor
- Jitendra kalbande
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 18\- 60 years ,ASA 1 and 2 both male and female, duration of surgery \- minimum 1 hr
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with contraindication to spinal anaesthesia, allergy to drug being used, patient with neurological deficit, pregnancy women
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of general and spinal anesthesia on the body's defense systems in diabetic patientsDiabetes.Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusIRCT201402208384N3Vice Chancellor for Research, Mashhad University of Medical Science63
Completed
Not Applicable
The anesthesia effect on serum levels and gene expression of interleukins in elective cesarean sectioIRCT20180304038943N1Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences40
Recruiting
Phase 3
The effect of general and spinal anesthesia on the level of inflammatory factors in hysterectomy surgeryInflammatory factors after hysterectomy.Abnormal uterine and vaginal bleeding, unspecifiedN93.9IRCT20190819044559N4Kerman University of Medical Sciences42
Completed
Not Applicable
A pilot study comparing general versus spinal anaesthesia for vaginal surgeryISRCTN76637086niversity Hospital of North Staffordshire (UK)80
Completed
Phase 3
The efficacy of exercise and spinal manipulative therapy for chronic LBPACTRN12605000053628niversity of Sydney240