Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03477227
NCT03477227CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of a Short Compression Hosiery (Stocking Without a Foot) With Standard Compression Stockings After Radiofrequency Ablation of Great Saphenous Vein With Phlebectomy: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University6 sites in 1 country187 target enrollmentStarted: December 29, 2017Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
187
Locations
6
Primary Endpoint
Quality of life score measured by CIVIQ20 questionnaire

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A prospective comparative randomized multicentre non-inferiority trial. The purpose of this study is to compares of a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.

Detailed Description

It is common practice to use compression hosiery in the postoperative period to reduce pain, swelling, ecchymosis and hematoms. Long-term compression therapy is associated with a number of inconveniences, which leads to a decrease in compliance and violation of the patient's appointed treatment schedule. The use of short compression stoking can improve the compliance to applying of compression in a round-the-clock mode while maintaining the effectiveness of therapy.

The aim of the study The purpose of this study is to compare a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.

Materials and methods A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. The study compares the effectiveness of a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.

The study includes patients who are scheduled for the radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein and phlebectomy varicose tributaries (CEAP classification classes C2-C4).

Endpoints in the study: the main outcome (primary endpoint) is the quality of life according to CIVIQ questionnaire on the 30th day after the intervention. Additional outcomes (secondary endpoints): comfort of using short compression stocking with the visual analog scale (VAS), pain level with the visual analogue scale (VAS), foot swelling. Registration of results for additional outcomes is conducted on days 1, 7, 14 and 30.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults over 18 years of age
  • Symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) vein reflux > 0.5 seconds on color Duplex
  • CEAP C2-C4 (inclusive)
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Symptomatic small saphenous vein (SSV) vein reflux
  • CEAP Class C5 or C6 disease
  • Prior GSV treatment
  • History of deep vein thrombosis
  • Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who are unable to attend the hospital for follow-up

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Quality of life score measured by CIVIQ20 questionnaire

Time Frame: 30 days

The specific quality of life score using the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire (CIVIQ) score Calculation of the Global Index Score (GIS) of CIVIQ-20 There are 20 questions in the CIVIQ-20, each with 5 possible answers (1 to 5), the minimum possible score being 20 and the maximum 100. In order to calculate the GIS, the difference between the final score and the minimum possible score is to be divided by the difference between the theoretical maximum and minimum scores (100-20=80), multiplied by 100.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comfort of using compression hosiery(1, 7, 14, 21, 30 days)
  • Pain level(1, 7, 14, 21, 30 days)

Investigators

Sponsor
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Igor Zolotukhin

Clinical Professor

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Study Sites (6)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials