Leveraging Social Networks: a Novel Physical Activity Intervention for Senior Housing
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Physical Inactivity
- Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Enrollment
- 8
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. The intervention is called Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (T-VIDA) and will be administered with two cohorts of residents in a single community. The study has two main goals: 1) To determine if an OT-led program administered remotely over the internet using Zoom is useful in helping residents increase their physical activity; and 2) to determine if involving respected members of the community in the program as Advisory Committee members has an impact on how much other residents participate in program activities and engage in behaviors discussed. The OT intervention will be comprised of a combination of adapted components from multiple evidence-based interventions including individual meetings with an OT and OT-led group sessions. To evaluate the intervention pre- and post-program interviews will be conducted with participants over the phone, and activity monitoring will be conducted after both the pre- and post-program interviews for 7-days using an activity monitoring device. The following hypotheses will be tested: 1) at least 75% (3 of 4) of identified residents will accept the invitation to serve on the Advisory Committee; 2) Advisory Committee Members will attend at least 2 of 3 committee meetings; 3) Participants will on average participate in at least 70% (7 of 10) of intervention activities; 4) Residents knowing one or more committee members at baseline will participate in more intervention activities compared to those who do not; and 5) The influence of knowing a committee member on participation will be greater among residents reporting more pain at baseline compared to those reporting less pain.
Investigators
Noah J Webster
Associate Research Scientist, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research
University of Michigan
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •resident of the senior housing community of focus
- •English-proficient
- •ambulatory with or without assistive device (e.g., cane, walker)
Exclusion Criteria
- •requiring use of a wheelchair for ambulation;
- •requiring highly specialized equipment (e.g., spinal cord injury, leg amputation, wound vacuum assisted closure, heavy leg boot);
- •hospitalized within last 3 months;
- •has probable dementia (TICSm score \<27);
- •requiring ongoing complicated treatments (e.g., home oxygen use \>2 liters);
- •has active mental health condition judged to pose significant barrier to participation; and
- •meets CDC recommendations for physical activity (150+ minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity during typical week).
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
Time Frame: 1 week pre-intervention
Number of originally identified potential Advisory Commitee Members who accept the invitation to serve on the committee. Possible scores range from 0 to 1.
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Member Participation
Time Frame: Week 5 of intervention
Number of committee meetings attended by Advisory Committee Members. Possible scores range from 0 to 3.
Process Outcome - Individual Activity Participation
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of individual (one-on-one) intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 6.
Process Outcome - Group Activity Participation
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of group intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 4.
Process Outcome - Total Activity Participation
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Total number of intervention activities attended by participants (individual and group). Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
Process Outcome - Number Acitivites Via Zoom
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started
Number of activities attended via zoom as opposed to calling in by telephone. Possible scores range from 0 to 10.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Self-reported Physical Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Pain Interference(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Pain Intensity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Physical Function Difficulty(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Self-efficacy in Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Percentage of Other Participants Known(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Respect Level of Other Participants(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Sedentary Behavior(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
- Change in Number of Steps(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)