Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06007664
NCT06007664
Completed
N/A

Leveraging Social Networks: a Novel Physical Activity Intervention for Senior Housing

University of Michigan1 site in 1 country8 target enrollmentAugust 23, 2023

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Physical Inactivity
Sponsor
University of Michigan
Enrollment
8
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This pilot study will test the feasibility of pairing a social network-based approach with a 6-week Occupational Therapist (OT)-led intervention administered remotely (via Zoom) to increase physical function and activity among residents of a HUD subsidized independent-living senior housing community. The intervention is called Tele-Video to Improve Daily Activity (T-VIDA) and will be administered with two cohorts of residents in a single community. The study has two main goals: 1) To determine if an OT-led program administered remotely over the internet using Zoom is useful in helping residents increase their physical activity; and 2) to determine if involving respected members of the community in the program as Advisory Committee members has an impact on how much other residents participate in program activities and engage in behaviors discussed. The OT intervention will be comprised of a combination of adapted components from multiple evidence-based interventions including individual meetings with an OT and OT-led group sessions. To evaluate the intervention pre- and post-program interviews will be conducted with participants over the phone, and activity monitoring will be conducted after both the pre- and post-program interviews for 7-days using an activity monitoring device. The following hypotheses will be tested: 1) at least 75% (3 of 4) of identified residents will accept the invitation to serve on the Advisory Committee; 2) Advisory Committee Members will attend at least 2 of 3 committee meetings; 3) Participants will on average participate in at least 70% (7 of 10) of intervention activities; 4) Residents knowing one or more committee members at baseline will participate in more intervention activities compared to those who do not; and 5) The influence of knowing a committee member on participation will be greater among residents reporting more pain at baseline compared to those reporting less pain.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 23, 2023
End Date
December 10, 2024
Last Updated
4 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Noah J Webster

Associate Research Scientist, Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research

University of Michigan

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • resident of the senior housing community of focus
  • English-proficient
  • ambulatory with or without assistive device (e.g., cane, walker)

Exclusion Criteria

  • requiring use of a wheelchair for ambulation;
  • requiring highly specialized equipment (e.g., spinal cord injury, leg amputation, wound vacuum assisted closure, heavy leg boot);
  • hospitalized within last 3 months;
  • has probable dementia (TICSm score \<27);
  • requiring ongoing complicated treatments (e.g., home oxygen use \>2 liters);
  • has active mental health condition judged to pose significant barrier to participation; and
  • meets CDC recommendations for physical activity (150+ minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity during typical week).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Members Accept Invitation

Time Frame: 1 week pre-intervention

Number of originally identified potential Advisory Commitee Members who accept the invitation to serve on the committee. Possible scores range from 0 to 1.

Process Outcome - Advisory Committee Member Participation

Time Frame: Week 5 of intervention

Number of committee meetings attended by Advisory Committee Members. Possible scores range from 0 to 3.

Process Outcome - Individual Activity Participation

Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started

Number of individual (one-on-one) intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 6.

Process Outcome - Group Activity Participation

Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started

Number of group intervention activities attended by participants. Possible scores range from 0 to 4.

Process Outcome - Total Activity Participation

Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started

Total number of intervention activities attended by participants (individual and group). Possible scores range from 0 to 10.

Process Outcome - Number Acitivites Via Zoom

Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention, 6 weeks after the intervention started

Number of activities attended via zoom as opposed to calling in by telephone. Possible scores range from 0 to 10.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Self-reported Physical Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Pain Interference(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Pain Intensity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Physical Function Difficulty(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Self-efficacy in Activity(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Percentage of Other Participants Known(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Respect Level of Other Participants(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Sedentary Behavior(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)
  • Change in Number of Steps(1 week pre and 1 week post the 6-week intervention)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials