Promotion of normal vaginal delivery
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Elective Cesarean.Delivery by elective cesarean section
- Registration Number
- IRCT2015092424168N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
Primigravida pregnant women who have prenatal care records at health centers; Primigravida pregnant women who have gestational age of 3 and 4 months; Primigravida pregnant women that sign informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Eligible Pregnant women for inclusion in the study, who change their address; eligible pregnant women for inclusion in the study, who have indications for cesarean delivery.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intention of delivery mode selection. Timepoint: Before the intervention and 1 month aftere the intervention. Method of measurement: Questionnaire.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Type of childbirth done by woman. Timepoint: 2 months aftere the intervention. Method of measurement: Investigating of pregnancy records or callinn with mother.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie elective cesarean section decision-making in primigravid women?
How does social marketing intervention compare to standard care in promoting normal vaginal delivery?
Are there specific biomarkers associated with successful normal vaginal delivery in primigravid patients?
What adverse events are commonly reported in elective cesarean section versus vaginal delivery?
What combination strategies or alternative interventions have shown efficacy in reducing elective cesarean rates?