MedPath

Evaluation for Healing of Iatrogenic Perforation After Repair With Different Materials

Phase 4
Conditions
Root Perforation at the Bifurcation Area
Interventions
Drug: Bioceramic putty
Registration Number
NCT06976411
Lead Sponsor
Mohamed Salah Elwakeel
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate healing potentiality of MTA and bioceramics materials as a root perforation repair material.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

is there is a significant difference in healing potentiality of MTA and bioceramics materials as a root perforation repair material?

Participants will:

enrollment will be from out-patients clinic of endodontic department, faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams university with root perforations. perforation repair will be done using either bio-ceramic or MTA repair material and preoperative or immediate postoperative CBCT and postoperative CBCT will be taken to compare healing.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with root perforation in lower molars.
  2. Patients had anon contributory medical history.
  3. Patients of age categories between 15 to 50 years old.
  4. No sex restriction.
  5. Small to medium size perforation.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with generalized chronic periodontitis.
  2. Teeth with difficult isolation.
  3. Non restorable teeth.
  4. Medically compromised patients.
  5. Patients with history of allergies to any of the medications to be used during or after the treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MTAMTA-
BioceramicBioceramic putty-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiographic success in terms of healing1 year

Healing outcome: the presence or absence of lesion and its size were obtained by analyzing CBCT of each case and classified into: Cases with complete resolution of lesion considered as "Healed", reduction of size considered as "Healing", and no size change or increase in lesion size considered as "Failure"

patients with clinical success1 year

A successful clinical outcome was defined as follows: no indication of apical periodontitis, no clinical signs and symptoms, and no loss of function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of dentistry ain shams university

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath