COMPARISON OF ULTRASOUND GUIDED CAUDAL BLOCK VERSUS ANATOMICAL LANDMARK BASED CAUDAL BLOCK IN PEDIATRIC SURGICAL CASES
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 124
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Success rate of caudal block
研究概览
简要总结
Caudal block is a routine procedure performed for the management of peri-operative pain. conventional landmark guided block is performed routinely throughout the world. In our study we compared USG guided caudal block and anatomical landmark based block for the success rate , complications associated block techniques.
Results - in ultrasound group success rate was 92.1% and bloody tap (3%) was the only complication noted.
in anartomical landmark technique, success rate was 81.8% with complications of bloody tap (23.8%) ,subcutaneous swelling (15.2%) ,dural puncture (1.5%) and rectal perforation (1.5%).
Conclusion: Ultrasound guided caudal block improves success rate,reduces complications and ensures safety
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Outcome Assessor Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1.00 Month(s) 至 12.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- Male
入选标准
- •1.ASA physical state 1and 2 2.Age <10 years 3.Infraumbilical surgeries.
排除标准
- •1.Lack of parental consent 2.Children with severe systemic disease 3.Coagulation disorders 4.Local infection at the site or allergy to local anaesthetic drugs.
结局指标
主要结局
Success rate of caudal block
时间窗: 30 min after start of surgery
次要结局
- complication(block performance time)