MedPath

Palbociclib in Real World Practice

Completed
Conditions
Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
Registration Number
NCT03280303
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

This Non-Interventional Study will describe and analyze the clinical use of palbociclib in routine clinical practice in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1285
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patients with a life expectancy of less than 3 months at the time of ABC diagnosis, per the investigator's judgment.

  2. Patients participating in any interventional clinical trial that includes investigational or marketed products at the time of enrollment. (Patients participating in other investigator initiated research or NIS can be included as long as their standard of care is not altered by the study).

  3. Patients on active treatment for malignancies other than ABC at the time of enrollment.

  4. Patients who are unable to understand the nature of the study and are unwilling to sign an informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants According to Real-World Tumor ResponseFrom start of palbociclib combination treatment until first documentation of progression (up to approximately 3 years)

Real world tumor response included complete response (CR), Partial response (PR), Stable disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), and was determined by physician based on imaging, biopsies, biomarkers, and/or clinical judgment. Response as assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria may not be available for all participants. rwTR was derived as the best tumor response recorded from the palbociclib combination treatment start date until the first documentation of progressive disease. Only response assessments recorded on or before the start date of next subsequent line of treatment will be considered.

Real-World Tumor Response RateFrom start of palbociclib combination treatment until first documentation of progression (up to approximately 3 years)

Real world tumor response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with a best tumor response of complete response or partial response. Tumor response was determined by physician based on imaging, biopsies, biomarkers, and/or clinical judgment. RECIST criteria may not be available for all participants.

Real World Progression Free SurvivalFrom initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to the earliest of clinician-documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (up to approximately 3 years)

Real world progression free survival was defined as time (months) from initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to the earliest of clinician-documented progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants without documented disease progression or death were censored at the last date of response assessment.

Overall SurvivalFrom initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to death due to any cause or censored, (up to approximately 3 years)

Overall survival was defined as time from initiation of the palbociclib combination treatment to date of death due to any cause. Participants without a documented death were censored at last available visit date known to be alive.

Absolute Eastern Co-Operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 1

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 2

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 3

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 9

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 12

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 15

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 18

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 21

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 24

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores in Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 27

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 30

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 33

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores in Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 36

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 39

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 42

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 1

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 2

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 3

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 6

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 15

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 18

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 21

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 24

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 27

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 30

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 33

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 36

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than 70 or Equal to Years OnlyMonth 39

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 42

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Baseline: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date)

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participant.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 1: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 1

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 2: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 2

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 3: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 3

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 6

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 9

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 18: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 18

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participant.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 21: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 21

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 24: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 24

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 27: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 27

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 30: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 30

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 33: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 33

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 36: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 36

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 39: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 39

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 42: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 42

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Number of Participants With Adverse EventsFrom start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years)

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in administered medicinal product. The event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the product treatment or usage.

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsFrom start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years).

A serious adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal or nutritional product (including pediatric formulas) at any dose that: resulted in death; was life-threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity (substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions); resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Number of Participants With Any Clinical Laboratory AbnormalitiesFrom start of palbociclib treatment or date of informed consent until 28 days after last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 3 years).

Following lab parameters were assessed Anemia, Hemoglobin increased, Lymphocyte count decreased, Lymphocyte count increased, Neutrophil count decreased, Platelet count decreased, Leukocyte count decreased, Leukocyte count increased, Number of participants with any lab abnormality was reported.

ECOG Performance Status Scores at Month 6: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 6

ECOG performance status was a 6-level item used to assess the physical health of participants and ranged from 0 (fully active) to 5 (dead).

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 9: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 9

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Geriatric 8 Screening Tool Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 12

The G8 Screening Tool consisted of 7 items based on the Mini-Nutritional Assessment and a single item covering the participants age. Specifically, the G8 assessed food intake, weight changes, mobility, neuropsychological problems, body mass index, prescription count, and health status compared to similarly aged participants. Points were associated to each item and index score was calculated by summing points. The index score ranged in value from 0 (heavily impaired) to 17 (not at all impaired). If any of the 8 items was missing, the total score was missing.

Change From Baseline to Month 6 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at BaselineBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 6

European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30: 30 item questionnaires composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

Change From Baseline to Month 12 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at BaselineBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 12

EORTC QLQ-C30: 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

Change From Baseline to Month 18 in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Scores at BaselineBaseline (last observed measurement prior to treatment start date) and Month 18

EORTC QLQ-C30: 30 item questionnaire composed of 5 functional subscales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health/global quality of life scale; 3 symptom subscales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting); and 6 single items that assessed additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties). All scales and single item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. Higher scores on functional and global quality of life scales represent better level of functioning. Higher scores on the symptom oriented scales represent more severe symptoms.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 12: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 12

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Activities of Daily Living Scores at Month 15: Participants More Than or Equal to 70 Years OnlyMonth 15

Activities of Daily Living is assessed using a six-item ADL limitations measure that inventoried whether participants had difficulty bathing, dressing, toileting, feeding, with transfer, and incontinence. Each item was rated on a 3-point Likert scale measuring independence in performing the activity and scores ranged from 1 to 3; where, 1=unable to do without assistance, 2=partial assistance needed and 3=no assistance. The total score was calculated as a sum of scores of individual items and ranged between 6 to 18, where a score of 6 indicated a very dependent participant and a score of 18 represented an independent participants.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (209)

Alabama Oncology

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Grandview Cancer Center, Alabama Oncology

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

The University of Alabama at Birmingham

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute

🇺🇸

Stuttgart, Arkansas, United States

Sutter Auburn

🇺🇸

Auburn, California, United States

AIS Cancer Center at Adventist Health Bakersfield

🇺🇸

Bakersfield, California, United States

Beverly Hills Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Providence Health and Services Southern California

🇺🇸

Burbank, California, United States

Enloe Regional Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Chico, California, United States

Scroll for more (199 remaining)
Alabama Oncology
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.