Dentoskeletal Changes Expansion Using Invisalign Versus Conventional Expander

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Expansion of Maxillary Arch; Maxillary Hypoplasia
• Interventions: Device: Invisalign; Device: Conventional expander

• Registration Number: NCT05899530
• Lead Sponsor: Al-Azhar University

Brief Summary

Cbct evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after expansion using Invisalign versus conventional expander

Detailed Description

Using cbct for evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after expansion using Invisalign versus conventional expander hyrax

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2023-05-25
• Status Verified: 2023-06
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-06-09
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-06-11
• Study First Posted: 2023-06-12
• Last Update Posted: 2023-06-13
• Study Start: 2023-07-22
• Primary Completion: 2024-03-30
• Study Completion: 2024-05-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

• Age (12-16)
• Good oral hygiene
• Constricted maxilla or moderate crowding

Exclusion Criteria

• Patient receive drugs
• Periodontal diseas
• Past Orthodontic treatment

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Invisalign	Invisalign	Expansion with Invisalign appliance
Conventional expander	Conventional expander	Expansion using conventional orthodontic expander(hyrax)

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Linear amount of midpalatal Suture opening	4 months	Apperance of Distema , calculate the amount of general space