Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Robotic esophagectomyProcedure: Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy
- Registration Number
- NCT03727126
- Lead Sponsor
- GEM Hospital & Research Center
- Brief Summary
Esophageal cancer is a debilitating condition. The treatment involved is complex requiring a combination of chemotherapy and surgery in most cases. Complete removal of the tumor and the adjacent lymph nodes is of utmost importance in improving the survival. Lymph node yield following surgery helps in proper staging of the disease and is an important prognosticating variable. It is hypothesized that the lymph node yield following robotic esophagectomy is higher than that following thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. The study aims to compare the short term oncological outcomes following robotic esophagectomy and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Resectable esophageal carcinoma, either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the middle or lower part the esophagus
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 and above
- Esophagectomy for other non-malignant conditions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Robotic esophagectomy Robotic esophagectomy Esophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using the da Vinci robotic surgical system Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy Esophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using conventional thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lymph node yield 7 days after Index Surgery Total number of lymph nodes harvested
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Surgical margin status 7 days after Index Surgery The proximal, distal and circumferential surgical margins will be assessed by pathological evaluation for the presence of tumor and will be assigned an "R" category as defined by the College of American Pathologists. R0 would indicate no evidence of residual tumor. Presence of microscopic tumor at margins would be designated as R1 whereas the presence of macroscopically visible tumor at margins would be designated as R2.
Hospital stay During index admission or re admission within 30 days Length of stay in hospital following surgery
Mortality During index admission or within 90 days following surgery Death following surgery
ICU stay During index admission or within 30 days after surgery Duration of stay in ICU following surgery
Complications Up to 90 days after surgery Intraoperative and post operative adverse events assessed by Clavien Dindo classification system
Duration of surgery 1 day after surgery Time taken to complete the surgical procedure recorded in minutes
Blood loss During surgery and up to 24 hours after index surgery Amount of blood lost during and within 24 hours of surgery
Conversion rate 1 day after surgery Need for conversion of the procedure to open or other alternate technique
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
GEM Hospital & Research Center
🇮🇳Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India