MedPath

Robotic Versus Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Not Applicable
Conditions
Esophageal Cancer
Interventions
Procedure: Robotic esophagectomy
Procedure: Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy
Registration Number
NCT03727126
Lead Sponsor
GEM Hospital & Research Center
Brief Summary

Esophageal cancer is a debilitating condition. The treatment involved is complex requiring a combination of chemotherapy and surgery in most cases. Complete removal of the tumor and the adjacent lymph nodes is of utmost importance in improving the survival. Lymph node yield following surgery helps in proper staging of the disease and is an important prognosticating variable. It is hypothesized that the lymph node yield following robotic esophagectomy is higher than that following thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy. The study aims to compare the short term oncological outcomes following robotic esophagectomy and thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for carcinoma esophagus.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Resectable esophageal carcinoma, either squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma in the middle or lower part the esophagus
Exclusion Criteria
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4 and above
  • Esophagectomy for other non-malignant conditions

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Robotic esophagectomyRobotic esophagectomyEsophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using the da Vinci robotic surgical system
Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomyThoracolaparoscopic esophagectomyEsophagectomy performed for esophageal cancer using conventional thoracoscopic and laparoscopic techniques
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lymph node yield7 days after Index Surgery

Total number of lymph nodes harvested

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Surgical margin status7 days after Index Surgery

The proximal, distal and circumferential surgical margins will be assessed by pathological evaluation for the presence of tumor and will be assigned an "R" category as defined by the College of American Pathologists. R0 would indicate no evidence of residual tumor. Presence of microscopic tumor at margins would be designated as R1 whereas the presence of macroscopically visible tumor at margins would be designated as R2.

Hospital stayDuring index admission or re admission within 30 days

Length of stay in hospital following surgery

MortalityDuring index admission or within 90 days following surgery

Death following surgery

ICU stayDuring index admission or within 30 days after surgery

Duration of stay in ICU following surgery

ComplicationsUp to 90 days after surgery

Intraoperative and post operative adverse events assessed by Clavien Dindo classification system

Duration of surgery1 day after surgery

Time taken to complete the surgical procedure recorded in minutes

Blood lossDuring surgery and up to 24 hours after index surgery

Amount of blood lost during and within 24 hours of surgery

Conversion rate1 day after surgery

Need for conversion of the procedure to open or other alternate technique

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

GEM Hospital & Research Center

🇮🇳

Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath