Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02072811
NCT02072811UnknownPhase 3

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Induction-consolidation Treatment Using a Double Induction in Patients With AML <60 Years Old, Depending on the Percentage of Blasts in the 14 Day, Residual Disease and Leukemic Hematopoietic Cells

dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska1 site in 1 country400 target enrollmentStarted: February 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Enrollment
400
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Complete remission after induction

Study Overview

Brief Summary

In view of the diversity of the biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy in individual patients must be individualized. One of the tools for this is molecular-cytogenetic stratification. It divides patients into five categories (prognostic groups): Favorable, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, Adverse and Very adverse risk. After remission proceedings are tailored depending on prognostic determined groups.

Research of PALG group in the application in the second line regimen CLAG and CLAG-M proved high effectiveness of this treatment with low toxicity. Considering experience of PALG groups, it seems that the use of the schema CLAG early as the second induction therapy is a viable treatment option.

Detailed Description

Patients with AML with one of 5 prognostic categories based on modified cytogenetic-molecular stratification (European Leukemia Net Prognostic System - ENL)

Favorable risk

t(8;21)(q22;q22); RUNX1-RUNX1T1 inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22); CBFB-MYH11 Mutated NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK) Mutated CEBPA (NK)

Intermediate I risk

Mutated NPM1 with FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 and FLT3-ITD (NK) Wild-type NPM1 without FLT3-ITD (NK)

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult acute myeloid leukemia
  • Age: ≥18 and ≤ 60
  • Clinical condition of the patient allows to carry out induction therapy: ECOG performance status: ≤ 2 and the Hematopoietic Cell Transplant-Co-morbidity Index (HCT-I): ≤3
  • Informed consent to participate in the study (ICF signed)
  • The second early induction start criteria is in addition to the listed above, the percentage of the blasts on the level >10% on 7th day.

Exclusion Criteria

  • No informed consent for participation in the study, mental illness, which don't allow to obtain informed consent and conduct the treatment according to the protocol
  • Pregnancy
  • HIV infection
  • Active cancer
  • Active hepatitis virus infection

Arms & Interventions

Induction, DAC

Other

The first stage of treatment.

First DAC induction cycle is common to all patients (regardless of risk group). After completion of induction I occurs early assessment of bone marrow on the +14 day after the start of treatment (+7 day after completion of chemotherapy).

Intervention: DAC (Drug)

II early induction, CLAG

Other

Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14> 10% receive early second induction (CLAG) which start form +16 day.

Patients with blasts in the bone marrow in D14 ≤ 10% do not receive early second induction and are qualified to assess the response times on +28 day or after full morphology recovery (if it occurs before the +28 day

Intervention: CLAG (Drug)

Consolidation, I HAM cycle

Other

I induction cycle starts after complete remission (CR).

  • After I consolidation, patients from Intermediate I an Intermediate II group (ELN prognostic system):

If compatible donor is present - allogeneic HSCT qualification after I or II consolidation. If compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT is not present - attempt to CD34+ mobilization for autologous SCT after II consolidation

  • After I consolidation, patients from Adverse risk group (ELN prognostic system):

If compatible donor is present - immediate qualification for allogeneic HSCT.

  • Finding a donor should be initiated in all patients, at the latest after the end of I induction. In the first place, it should be checked whether the patient has a donor family, if not - searching start for an unrelated donor. For patients with no compatible donor for allogeneic HSCT - need to start searching for an alternative donor

Intervention: Consolidation, I HAM cycle (Drug)

II Consolidation HiDAraC

Other

Patients from all 5 risk group receive second after first consolidation [Ara-C] Patient from Very adverse risk receive Ara-C + CLA (Cladribine). If it is needed - more intensive consolidation treatment with 2-Cda.

Patients form Very adverse risk receive Maintenance treatment:

Decitabine 20 mg/m2 60 min infusion iv (Intravenous injection) for 5 days every 6 weeks.

Patients from Favorable, - Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups: CD34+ mobilization (HSCT qualification).

Intervention: II Consolidation HiDAraC (Drug)

Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle

Other

Patients from Favorable, Intermediate I an Intermediate II risk groups receive III consolidation or autologous HSCT (depends on results of mobilization).

Patients from Adverse risk receive III Consolidation HiDAraC + Cladribina (CLA) If no CR: CLAG-M reinduction therapy and after CR - treatment according to protocol.

Intervention: Consolidation, III HiDAraC cycle (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Complete remission after induction

Time Frame: 28 days

Outcome measure after induction: At +28 day after treatment or after full morphology recovery (if it occurs before the +28 day) Complete remission, according to Cheson's CR criteria: * Lack of extramedullary infiltration, * Platelet count\> 100 G / L, * Neutrophil count\> 1.0 G / L, * Lack of blast cells in the blood, * Bone marrow blasts \<5% in the cytomorphology. After induction treatment, patients are qualified for one of the pro-remission treatment options, which is associated with cytogenetic-molecular risk groups, according to the modification of the molecular ELN / MDACC. Therapeutic decisions are being made according to cytogenetic-molecular stratification: Favorable, Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, Adverse and Very adverse risk.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

dr hab. n. med. Agnieszka Wierzbowska

PhD in Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Hematology Department

Polish Adult Leukemia Group

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Role of the Therapy Tailored to Risk... | Clinical Trial