MedPath

Single vs Double Symphyseal Plating in Management of Vertically Unstable Open Book Pelvic Ring Injuries:

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Evaluation of Single Symphyseal Plating in APC III Injuries
Interventions
Procedure: single symphyseal plating in management of vertically unsable open book pelvic ring injuries
Registration Number
NCT06439108
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

compare functional, radiological outcomes, implant failure and the incidence of recurrent diastasis of single superior symphyseal plate versus double plating in management of vertically unstable open book injuries

Detailed Description

The real algorithm was the necessity for double superior \& anterior plating versus single superior symphyseal plate in management of APC III pelvic ring injuries, whether the incidence of intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications, recurrent diastasis, radiological and functional outcomes differed between these two methods. Our hypothesis was that the use of an additional anterior symphyseal plating could provide a more rigid fixation, with less complications of recurrent diastasis or implant failure. Also it will be applied through the same incision without increasing the patient overall morbidity.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Anterior ring symphyses diastasis
  • Tile C pelvic ring injuries
  • Age between 16-60 years' old
Exclusion Criteria
  • Tile B pelvic ring injuries
  • Isolated bony fractures of the anterior pelvic ring
  • Open fractures
  • Age less than 14 years and older than 60 years
  • Associated internal organ injuries that require definitive intervention

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
double superior & anterior symphyseal platessingle symphyseal plating in management of vertically unsable open book pelvic ring injuries15 cases undergoing double superior \& anterior symphyseal plates, 15 cases undergoing double superior \& anterior symphyseal plates, reduction of the posterior ring was either closed reduction in SI joint dislocations \& fracture-dislocations and sacral fractures or open reduction in iliac wing fractures through the lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach.Anterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation was done via the classic Pfannenstiel approach
single superior symphyseal platesingle symphyseal plating in management of vertically unsable open book pelvic ring injuries15 cases undergoing single superior symphyseal plate, reduction of the posterior ring was either closed reduction in SI joint dislocations \& fracture-dislocations and sacral fractures or open reduction in iliac wing fractures through the lateral window of the ilioinguinal approach.Anterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation was done via the classic Pfannenstiel approach
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of recurrent diastasisthroughout study completion, average one year postoperative

rate of symphyseal translation was measured \& compared between the two study groups

Rate of Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor clinical outcome1 year postoperative

clinical assessment by Majeed pelvic scoring system evaluated and calculated at each follow-up visit with the mean value presented

Rate of Excellent, Good, Fair or Poor radiological outcome1 year postoperative

Radiological assessment using Matta \& Tornetta radiological principles via plain x-ray pelvis showing both hips: anteroposterior, inlet and outlet views \& CT pelvis if available; we evaluated five criteria on X-ray films postoperatively: residual posterior displacement, vertical displacement, pubic symphyseal translation, sagittal rotation, and gapping of the sacroiliac joint; according to the grading of Matta and Tornetta, we classified the results into Excellent (less than or equal 4 mm), Good (4-10 mm), Fair (10-20 mm), and Poor (more than 20 mm).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean intraoperative blood lossup to 5 days post-operative

The mean blood loss was calculated in milliliters and compared between the two study groups, it was measured intraoperative and postoperative from suction drains

Mean operative timeIt was calculated intra-operative

The mean operation time was calculated in minutes and compared between the two study groups

postoperative complications' rate1 year post-operative

We focused the evaluation of Postoperative complications on the local complications related to fixation principles and technique: LLD, implant failure, wound infection, residual malunion or non-union of the anterior ring, and loss of reduction (2ry SI dislocation or any rotational or vertical re-displacement)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Islam Sayed Moussa

🇪🇬

Cairo, Abassia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath