MedPath

Protocol Based Selective Imaging Versus Routine Computed Tomography or Ultrasound in Suspected Appendicitis

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Appendicitis
Registration Number
NCT06083064
Lead Sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare protocol based selective imaging to routine imaging in adult patients with suspected appendicitis. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are:

* Does protocol based selective imaging using clinical scoring affect clinical outcome?

* Does protocol based selective observation combined with score based selective imaging affect clinical outcome?

Participants will be randomized into three groups:

* Selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score

* Selective observation based on Appendicitis Severity Score combined with selective imaging based on Adult Appendicitis Score

* Routine imaging using ultrasound and/or computed tomography

Researchers will compare selective imaging groups separately with routine imaging to see if number of negative appendectomies or number of complicated appendicitis is not significantly increased.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
900
Inclusion Criteria
  • Suspicion of appendicitis
Exclusion Criteria
  • Time from symptom onset over 72 hours
  • Age <18 years
  • Pregnancy, ruled out by serum or urine HCG measurement in 18- to 49-year-old women
  • CT-scan or ultrasound already done within the last 3 days (72 hours)
  • Clinical suspicion of other disease or other reason to perform imaging study
  • Recruited earlier to the same trial

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Complicated appendicitisWithin 30 days from randomization

Number of patients with complicated appendicitis (AAST grade 3 or higher)

Negative appendectomyWithin 30 days from randomization

Number of negative appendectomies (surgical removal of non-inflamed appendix)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L EQ-VAS score)During the first 30 days from randomization

Quality of life determined by weekly EQ-5D-5L EQ-VAS score.

histologically proven appendicitisWithin 30 days from randomization

Number of patients with histologically proven appendicitis undergoing surgery

CT scanWithin 30 days from randomization

Number of patients having abdominal computed tomography

AppendicitisWithin 2 years from randomization

Number of patients diagnosed with appendicitis

Costs in EurosDuring the first 30 days from randomization

Overall costs of diagnostics and treatment

Adverse eventsWithin one year from randomization

Number patients with of adverse events (surgical complications, surgical site infections or delayed significant diagnosis)

Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L index value)During the first 30 days from randomization

Quality of life determined by weekly EQ-5D-5L index values.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

HUS, Jorvi Hospital

🇫🇮

Espoo, Finland

HUS, Meilahti Hospital

🇫🇮

Helsinki, Finland

HUS, Hyvinkää Hospital

🇫🇮

Hyvinkää, Finland

HUS, Jorvi Hospital
🇫🇮Espoo, Finland
Hanna Lampela, MD
Contact
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath