Multicentric Study of Comparison of the Effectiveness of a Web Fracture Liaison Service (e_FLS) to Fracture Liaison Services in France: the evAB Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 撤回
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To compare the efficacy of eFLS to conventional FLS to initiate an antiosteoporotic treatment after a recent fracture (<3 months) at one year in patients aged 60 years and more
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture.
详细描述
Osteoporotic fractures such as hip fractures and severe fractures are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and impose a large financial burden on healthcare systems. Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures are at higher risk of subsequent fractures. Other severe fractures (pelvis, vertebrae, humerus) have similar consequences, pelvis. The risk of refracture after fracture depends on the time: it is 5 times higher in the first 2-3 years, and 2 times higher after. This notion of Imminent Fracture Risk is the basis for the development of post-fracture care pathways called "fracture liaison. The implementation of FLS is the most effective way to reduce the risk of secondary fracture. Despite their success, FLS programs are not an integral part of post-fracture care throughout the France. The investigators believe that the barriers to the implementation of such a pathway are multiple and are largely related to the lack of accessibility for patients to FLS, and to the mobilization of important and unsustainable human resources. Some French public hospitals or institutions are currently building some e_FLS models based on an automatic detection of patients with fractures, and a on a cloud-based system where practitioners across the health care sector can communicate and jointly manage osteoporotic patients. The investigators' hypothesis is that this web FLS (e_FLS) is at least as effective as the classical FLS for the secondary fracture prevention.
The objective of the investigators' study is to compare web FLS model (e_FLS) to conventional FLS in terms of increasing the proportion of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment in the year after a low trauma fracture (evAB project).
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 60 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Men and women aged above 60 years, living in France, with fragility fractures in response to low-energy trauma (e.g., a fall from standing height).
- •The patient or his legal representative does not object to the patient's participation in the research Note: Patients in guardianship or curatorship can be included in this protocol
排除标准
- •Pathological fractures, high trauma fractures and per prosthetic fractures.
- •Non registration with a social security scheme (holder or beneficiary).
结局指标
主要结局
To compare the efficacy of eFLS to conventional FLS to initiate an antiosteoporotic treatment after a recent fracture (<3 months) at one year in patients aged 60 years and more
时间窗: one year
Number of patients receiving an antiosteoporotic treatment at one year
次要结局
- To compare the proportion of patients with deaths over one year in the eFLS and in conventional FLS(one year)
- To compare the proportion of patients with bone densitometry performed over one year in the eFLS and in conventional FLS(one year)
- To compare the number of patients with recent fracture (less of 3 months) in the eFLS and conventional FLSs(one year)
- To compare the proportion of patients with incident fracture over one year seen in the eFLS and in conventional FLS(one year)
