跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/089147
CTRI/2025/06/089147尚未招募不适用

Incidence of lymphedema among cT1-3N1-2M0 breast cancer patients undergoing sentinal node biopsy VS Axillary clearance after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: An ambispective observational study

Dr. Brijesh Kumar Singh1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 168 人开始时间: 2025年7月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
168
试验地点
1
主要终点
Rate of arm lymphedema 1 year after surgery

研究概览

简要总结

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide and continues to contribute significantly to global cancer mortality and morbidity. Surgical management of the axilla plays a crucial role in treating breast cancer. Over the past several decades, breast cancer treatment has evolved significantly, transitioning from routine radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for all patients to a more individualized surgical approach.

Historically, ALND was performed in all cases to remove the entire locoregional tumor burden, with the belief that this would improve survival. However, this approach has been challenged, as ALND carries significant morbidity, notably arm lymphedema, which affects one in five breast cancer survivors and has a considerable negative psychosocial impact.

To reduce this morbidity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been shown to downstage axillary disease, allowing for the de-escalation of axillary surgery from extensive procedures like ALND to less invasive ones like sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), thereby minimizing complications.

Over the last decade, evidence from various retrospective studies has demonstrated that SLNB alone does not increase axillary recurrence rates (ARR) or worsen disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) compared to ALND in patients with clinically node-positive (cN+) disease rendered node-negative (cN0) after NACT. However, most of these studies have been conducted in Western populations, with small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and relatively short-term outcomes.

Emerging evidence suggests that ALND can be safely avoided and replaced with SLNB in this subset of patients without affecting ARR, DFS, or OS, while significantly reducing the risk of lymphedema. However, there is a lack of data regarding the outcomes of this approach in Indian breast cancer patients.

We hypothesize that in breast cancer patients with axillary nodal metastases (cT1-3N1-2M0) who are rendered cN0 by NACT, SLNB (intervention) compared to ALND (control) will reduce the risk of arm lymphedema without increasing cancer recurrence at a one-year follow-up.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
Female

入选标准

  • Disease stage: cT1-3N1-2M0 at diagnosis (prior to NACT) as per AJCC 8th edition 2)Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR)and HER2 status evaluated on primary tumour 3)Received standard NACT as per local guidelines and become cN0, Axilla imaging to assess response to NACT (as per local guidelines) 4)Undergo dual tracer sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NACT.

排除标准

  • Bilateral synchronous invasive breast cancer, 2)Sentinel node biopsy prior to NACT, Previous 3)Axillary nodal surgery on the same body side.

结局指标

主要结局

Rate of arm lymphedema 1 year after surgery

时间窗: 1 year

次要结局

  • Axillary recurrence rate, Recurrence free interval, Axillary recurrence free interval, Other locoregional recurrence rates (breast or chest wall recurrence), Rate of distant metastasis(1,2 and 5 years)

研究者

发起方
Dr. Brijesh Kumar Singh
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Brijesh Kumar Singh

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验