Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05290779
NCT05290779
Completed
Not Applicable

Ultrasound Versus Fluoroscopy-guided Selective Lumbar Nerve Root Injection for Treatment of Radicular Pain

Minia University1 site in 1 country74 target enrollmentApril 6, 2021

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Sponsor
Minia University
Enrollment
74
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
improvement of visual analogue score of pain
Status
Completed
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The study is conducted to compare pain relief, accuracy and safety and radiation exposure of selective lumbar nerve root injection for lumbar radicular pain using ultrasound guidance versus fluoroscopy guidance

Detailed Description

Radicular pain is believed to be induced by irritation or inflammation of a nerve root caused by mechanical pressure or chemical irritation from degeneration herniation or rupture of intervertebral disc .Nerve root steroid injection is the most commonly performed minimally invasive technique for treatment of radicular pain in lumbar spine.The mechanism of action of steroids is to reduce inflammation by reduction in proinflammatory mediators around the nerve root, causing reduction in pain levels . Although Fluoroscopy guided technique is the most widely accepted method in lumbar selective nerve root injection, but recently ultrasound technique has gained acceptance among physicians due its reliability, efficacy, real-time guidance of injection and reduction of radiation exposure. Real-time guidance of injection provided by ultrasonography allows for good identification of the spinous process and adjacent structures such as lamina, zygapophyseal articulations and transverse process allowing for safer and potentially equally effective injection technique. The patients are randomly allocated into two groups; one group will receive injection under fluoroscopy guidance and the other group will receive injection under ultrasound guidance. The two groups are compared in terms of pain relief, accuracy and safety and radiation exposure.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 6, 2021
End Date
May 16, 2022
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Minia University
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Islam Ahmed Bakr Mohammed

Director

Minia University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • adult patients aged 18-60 years .
  • Both sexes .
  • With unilateral chronic lumbar radicular pain for more than 3 months.
  • Cooperative and oriented patients.
  • All patients are diagnosed by a neurologist for radicular low back pain through clinical presentation, medical examinations, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Infection at the site of injection.
  • Spine fractures.
  • Previous back surgery.
  • Progressive neurologic disorders.
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Presence of motor or sphencteric disturbance.
  • Bilateral radicular pain.
  • Allergy to substance of injection.
  • Patients with body mass index (BMI) more than 35.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

improvement of visual analogue score of pain

Time Frame: 3 months

evaluation of pain relief using visual analogue score on a scale from 0 to 10 with higher scores mean worse outcome

improvement of Oswestry disability index score for back pain

Time Frame: 3 months

evaluation of pain relief using Oswestry disability index score on a scale from 0% to 100% with the higher scores mean worse outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

  • safety of technique(3 months)
  • radiation exposure(1 hour)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials