MedPath

HoLEP Vs BPEP for Large Prostatic Adenoma

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Prostate Hyperplasia
Interventions
Procedure: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Registration Number
NCT04275076
Lead Sponsor
Ahmed Maher Gamil Ahmed Higazy
Brief Summary

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common urinary disorders in elderly males. The symptoms of BPH include impaired physiological and functional well-being, which interferes with daily living.

At present, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the standard surgical treatment. However, the high rate of complications associated with TURP is a major drawback of this procedure.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was proven to be an effective surgical treatment for BPH with no prostate size limitation with adequate hemostasis, bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BPEP) has been introduced as an alternative energy source with a promising outcome with equal safety and efficacy

Detailed Description

Enlarged prostate represents the most common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in elderly men including irritative, obstructive urinary symptoms or even urinary retention that significantly affects the quality life (QoL).

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) represents the standard surgical technique for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with a prostate size less than 80 ml. However, considerable morbidities are associated with larger sizes.

Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has been recognized as a treatment option for large prostatic adenomas, since first described by Hiraoka et.al, in 1986, it started to gain popularity despite the long learning curve. Many studies have evaluated its efficacy against the gold standard open prostatectomy in large prostate size more than 80ml and showed its safety and efficacy.

EEP represents an anatomical surgical technique resembling a surgeon's finger in open prostatectomy where any energy source that provides adequate haemostasis could be used. Many studies concluded that EEP relies on the surgeon's skills rather than the energy source itself. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was first described by Gilling in 1998 and was proven to be effective with no prostate size limitation with adequate haemostasis, recently it has been approved as a standard treatment for large prostatic adenoma, bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BPEP) has been introduced as an alternative energy source with a promising outcome with equal safety and efficacy.

Few studies evaluated both techniques, one study was done by Shoma et al. showing no statistical difference regarding safety and efficacy between both techniques, another study conducted by Enikeev et al. reported earlier recovery and catheter removal with HoLEP compared to BPEP. However, cost-effectiveness was never been evaluated before between both techniques especially in developing countries.

With such scarce information, the investigators aimed through this study to compare these two energy sources in the enucleation procedure of the prostate in terms of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness in the management of BPH in large prostatic adenoma more than 80 ml.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Men who are fit for surgery and need a surgical resection of the prostate larger than 80 ml including:

    1. Bothersome LUTS with an IPSS score over 19
    2. Refractory hematuria
    3. Upper urinary tract affection
    4. Recurrent UTI secondary to prostatic enlargement
    5. Maximum uroflow rate (Qmax) below 10 ml/sec.
    6. bladder diverticula
    7. Urinary retention whether recurrent acute attacks with failure of medical treatment or chronic retention.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with:

    1. Neurogenic bladder
    2. Previous prostate or urethral surgery
    3. Associated urethral stricture
    4. Prostate cancer diagnosed by TRUS biopsy
    5. Bladder stones,

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Holmium laser enucleation of the prostateHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasiaHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate
bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostateHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasiabipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
operative time50-120 minutes

form the beginning of endoscopic procedure till catheter insertion

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
irrigation fluidintra-operative finding

Average Irrigation fluid used in each group in liters

Postoperative efficacy:12 months

postoperative prostate volume assessment in grams

Cost analysis1 year

average running cost evaluation in both procedure

Enucleation efficacy of HoLEP12 months

Mean Enucleation time (HoLEP) in minutes divided by Mean resected volume in grams

Enucleation efficacy of BEEP12 months

Mean Enucleation time (BPEP) in minutes/ Mean resected volume in grams

resected volumeintra-operative finding

resected volume in grams

Operative safety:intra-operative finding

morcellation injury, Yes/No

Mean energy in (HoLEP) in joulesintra-operative finding

Mean energy in (HoLEP) in joules

catheter removal time1-7 days

postoperative time till catheter removal

hemoglobin dropintra-operative finding

blood loss in dl/ml

conversion to other type of surgeryintra-operative finding

conversion to other types of surgeries like TURP, open surgery, procedure abortion

cost effectiveness12 months

Running cost in Egyptian pounds of the following: irrigation fluid, hospital stay, fiber, loop, management of complication in each group

hospital stay1-7 days

duration of postoperative hospital stay in days

early post operative complication1 month

urine retention, Yes/No

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University Hospitals

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath