跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06681584
NCT06681584进行中(未招募)不适用

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve for Physiological Assessment in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease (ECONOMY)

National Heart Centre Singapore3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 340 人开始时间: 2021年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
入组人数
340
试验地点
3
主要终点
Compare the diagnostic performance of FFRB vs. standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.

研究概览

简要总结

Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. A rapid simplified method had been developed to determine non-invasive FFR (FFRB) by applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on anatomic models derived from computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA).In this current study, the aims is to compare the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, safety outcomes, and quality of life of using FFRB on top of CTCA for CAD diagnosis and treatment planning, versus standard of care in Singapore; and measure health care resource utilization and assess cost-effectiveness of adopting FFRB on top of CTCA to support decision making in managing patients with suspected CAD.

详细描述

Chest pain due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is a main driver of healthcare costs. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard to discriminate ischemia. A rapid simplified method had been developed to determine non-invasive FFR (FFRB) by applying computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation on anatomic models derived from computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA), which compares favorably with invasive FFR and significantly improves diagnostic accuracy than CTCA alone in a previous preliminary study.

In this study, the aim is to compare the diagnostic accuracy, clinical effectiveness, safety outcomes, and quality of life of using FFRB on top of CTCA for CAD diagnosis and treatment planning, versus standard of care in Singapore; and measure health care resource utilization and assess cost-effectiveness of adopting FFRB on top of CTCA to support decision making in managing patients with suspected CAD.

The study protocol for CTCA scan is as follows.

  1. CTCA will be performed with Single- or dual-source CT scanners (Toshiba AquilionOne, Cannon Aquilion One, Philips 256-dector, GE Revolution, Siemens Somatom Force Dual Source 384-detector, Siemens Somatom Drive Dual Source 256-detector) scanners.
  2. CTCA scan will follow local CTCA scanning protocols that meet the quality standards defined by the Society of Cardiac Computed Tomography.
  3. The CTCA image analysis will be performed according to accepted guidelines for reporting.

A total of 400 patients with chest pain will be recruited and randomly assigned into two groups. Both groups of patients will receive CTCA. But only one group of patients will be given the FFRB results. Based on the available medical information, the patients may be referred for additional non-invasive tests or ICA. For the recruited patients, who are referred for ICA subsequently, at least one FFR measurement will be conducted. All recruited patients will receive follow up at the time of 90days, 180 days and 365 days post-CTCA, as well as at the end-of-study, to record the quality of life, medical expenses and MACE events. The recruited patients will also receive follow up (phone or office visit) at the time of 90days (+30/-15 days), 180 days (+/-30 days) and 365 days (+/- 30 days) after enrolment, as well as at the end-of-study when the last recruited patient has completed one-year follow-up. Patient's response to the two questionnaires (SAQ 7 and EQ-5D-5L), their use of medication and the following clinical events will be recorded during the baseline visit and follow ups.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 98 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Aged 21 to 98
  • Providing written informed consent
  • Subjects with intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD and with symptomatic suspected CAD who are scheduled to undergo initial clinically-indicated non-invasive coronary evaluation and have not undergone non-invasive coronary evaluation, including exercise tolerance testing, stress echocardiography, SPECT or MRI, or CTCA within the past 90 days OR ICA at any time.

排除标准

  • Suspicion of acute coronary syndrome. Subjects experiencing unstable angina are not excluded where clinical documentation has ruled out myocardial infarctions.
  • Prior, clinically documented myocardial infarction
  • PCI prior to first test
  • Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) prior to first test
  • Contraindications for CTCA such as
  • Presence of pacemaker or internal defibrillator leads
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Known anaphylactic allergy to iodinated contrast
  • Pregnancy or unknown pregnancy status in women of childbearing potential
  • Body mass index> 35kg/m2
  • Contraindication to acute beta blockade

结局指标

主要结局

Compare the diagnostic performance of FFRB vs. standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.

时间窗: 1 year for each enrolled subject

The outcome is the rate of invasive coronary angiography.

次要结局

  • Compare the total costs based on FFRB compared with standard care in suspected coronary artery disease.(1 year for each enrolled subject)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验