KCT0002391尚未招募未知
Two different femoral fixation in ACL reconstruction: Rigidfix versus endobutton
Kyung Hee University Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 277 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 277
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational Study
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18(Year) 至 o Limit（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1. Soft tissue graft, single bundle
- •2. Femoral tunnel diameter of graft 8,9mm
排除标准
- •1. Undergone revision surgery
- •2. Conservative management
- •3. Pediatric patients with growth plate
- •4. Concomitant surgery
- •5. Double bundle technique
研究者
相似试验
Unknown
不适用
ACL Reconstruction With Simple and Double Bundle Technique Using Two Different Implants for Graft FixationKnee InjuriesACL TearACL InjurySports InjuryNCT04550299Vita Care112
Unknown
不适用
Peripheral Nerve Block (Femoral - Sciatic - Obturator) Versus General Anesthesia for Arthroscopic ACL RepairArthroscopic ACL RerpairSurgeryAnesthesia CareNCT02186899Larissa University Hospital150
Unknown
不适用
The Best Method for ACL Reconstruction.Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionNCT03192761Lars Konradsen90
尚未招募
不适用
Patient Specific Instrumentation in ACL ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesNCT05574452University Medical Center Groningen10
已完成
不适用
Comparison of Two ACL Reconstruction Techniques: All-inside Versus Complete Tibial Tunnel TechniqueAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearNCT05574946Samsun University71