A Comparison of C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy and Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
- Conditions
- IntubationChildrenVideolaryngoscopy
- Interventions
- Device: C-MAC videolaryngoscopeDevice: Direct Laryngoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT03908775
- Lead Sponsor
- Inonu University
- Brief Summary
Nasotracheal intubation is indicated in patients undergoing oral, maxillofacial, or dental procedures. During nasal intubation with the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope, use of Magill's forceps or external laryngeal manipulation is usually required to facilitate intubation. The prolonged or multiple intubation attempts and, subsequently, may be associated with complications such as oxygen desaturation or airway and dental injuries.
The C-MAC videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a videolaryngoscope using a modified Macintosh blade, which may be a useful alternative both for routine and difficult airway management and for educational purposes.
In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare C-MAC and DL in terms of intubation times, hemodynamic response and adverse events associated with nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental procedures.
- Detailed Description
Tracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy is successful in the majority of patients, even when a line-of-sight view of the glottis is not possible. Although poor glottic visualization is encountered between 1% and 9% of attempts, success can generally be achieved with additional force, external laryngeal manipulation, or the use of gum elastic bougies and stylets. However, poor glottic exposure is more likely to require prolonged or multiple intubation attempts and, subsequently, may be associated with complications such as oxygen desaturation or airway and dental injuries. In recent years, videolaryngoscopy has begun to play an important role in the management of patients with an unanticipated difficult or failed laryngoscopic intubation.
The C-MAC videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) is a videolaryngoscope using a modified Macintosh blade, which may be a useful alternative both for routine and difficult airway management and for educational purposes.
In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, the purpose is to compare C-MAC and DL in terms of intubation times, hemodynamic response and adverse events associated with nasotracheal intubation in children undergoing dental procedures.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
- 3-12 years
- American Society of Anesthesiology score I-II,
- undergoing dental procedure
- required nasotracheal intubation
- Patients for risk of aspiration
- Upper airway abnormalities
- Known difficult airways
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group VL C-MAC videolaryngoscope C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Patients intubated with C-MAC Videolaryngoscope Group DL Direct Laryngoscope Direct Laryngoscope Patients intubated with Direct laryngoscope
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to intubation From beginning of inserting nasotracheal tube into nares to seeing two meaningful end-tidal carbon dioxide levels up to 3 minutes Time to intubation was defined as the time the nasotracheal tube was inserted into nares the until endtidal CO2 was detected
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Heart Rate From beginning of Anesthesia induction to 10th minutes of intubation Heart Rate
Mean Arterial Pressure From beginning of Anesthesia induction to 10th minutes of intubation Mean Arterial Pressure
Adverse Events During the first 1 hour postoperatively Bleeding in the mouth and nose, the Magill Forceps use, burst of intubation tube cuff, external laryngeal pressure, presence of head position change, laryngospasm, hypoxia.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Inonu University
🇹🇷Malatya, Turkey