MedPath

Study of Methyl Aminolaevulinate Photodynamic Therapy With and Without Er:YAG Laser in Actinic Cheilitis

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Actinic Cheilitis
Interventions
Drug: MAL-PDT
Registration Number
NCT02198469
Lead Sponsor
Dong-A University
Brief Summary

Methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is advantageous in that it has few cosmetic side effects and minimises patient discomfort. However, its relatively low efficacy prevents its application to the treatment of actinic cheilitis(AC). Er:YAG ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatment removes the stratum corneum to increase MAL uptake and may improve efficacy. However, no studies have directly compared the efficacy of MAL-PDT with and without Er:YAG AFL in treating AC

Detailed Description

Actinic cheilitis (AC) is a keratinocytic neoplasm of the lip, especially the lower lip, is confined to the epidermis, and results from chronic or excessive ultraviolet exposure. AC is an early manifestation of lip squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and SCC of the lip is usually associated with an identifiable pre-existent AC. Furthermore, the likelihood that AC will progress to SCC is higher than actinic keratosis (AK). Consequently, early identification and treatment of AC is recommended. PDT involves the activation of a photosensitizer by irradiation with 400- to 700-nm light to create cytotoxic oxygen and free radicals that kill dysplastic cells.

Methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is advantageous in that it has few cosmetic side effects and minimises patient discomfort. However, its relatively low efficacy prevents its application to the treatment of actinic cheilitis(AC).

Erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) ablative fractional laser (AFL) therapy has been used frequently to improve treatment efficacy of PDT. Er:YAG AFL can ablate stratum corneum with minimal penetration depth and producing minimal thermal injury. This approach creates microscopic vertical holes in the ablated tissue, surrounded by thin layers of coagulated tissue. Er:YAG AFL does not injure the entire thickness of the epidermis; therefore, healing times are minimised. Erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) ablative fractional laser (AFL) has been proven in recent studies to facilitate the delivery and uptake of topical MAL deep into the skin, enhancing porphyrin synthesis and photodynamic activation.

The aim of our study was to compare efficacy, recurrence rate, cosmetic outcome, and safety between Er:YAG AFL-assisted MAL-PDT (Er:YAG AFL MAL-PDT) and standard MAL-PDT in patients with AC.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
33
Inclusion Criteria
  • Korean patients ≄ 18 years of age who had biopsy-confirmed AC lesions
Exclusion Criteria
  • porphyria
  • known allergies to the MAL cream or lidocaine
  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • any active systemic infectious disease
  • immunosuppressive treatment
  • personal history of malignant melanoma
  • tendency towards melasma or keloid formation
  • prior treatment of the lesions within 4 weeks
  • any indication of poor compliance

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
FACTORIAL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MAL-PDTMAL-PDTEligible patients were successively randomised to receive treatment with a single session of Er:YAG AFL MAL-PDT or 2 sessions of MAL-PDT with a 1-week interval between sessions
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference the efficacy between Er:YAG AFL-assisted MAL-PDT (Er:YAG AFL MAL-PDT) and standard MAL-PDT.Efficacy was evaluated at 3 months and 12 months after treatment

Lesion response was classified as either complete (complete disappearance of the lesion) or incomplete (incomplete disappearance) on the basis of visual examination and palpation. The response of each lesion was clinically evaluated

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference of the cosmetic outcomes between Er:YAG AFL-assisted MAL-PDT (Er:YAG AFL MAL-PDT) and standard MAL-PDT.Cosmetic outcome was assessed by each investigator for all lesions that achieved a complete response at 12 months

It was graded using a 4-point scale: excellent (only slight occurrence of redness or change in pigmentation), good (moderate redness or change in pigmentation), fair (slight-to-moderate scarring, atrophy, or induration), or poor (extensive scarring, atrophy, or induration)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dong-A University

šŸ‡°šŸ‡·

Busan, Dong dae sin-dong, Seo-gu, Korea, Republic of

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath